Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bakdash, 830 N.W.2d 906.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Morris Robert Chie Ryan Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Morris Robert Chie Ryan Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The doctrine of transferred intent is incorporated into the statute by the use of the phrase “or another.” State v. 6 Bakdash, (describing sections 609.185(a)(1) and 609.19, subdivision 1(1)) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1; (explaining that, to prove attempted murder, “it is not necessary for the state to specifically establish an intended victim so long as there is proof of a defendant’s intent to cause the death of a person”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- 54 (Minn. 2023) (requiring specific intent to kill for intentional second-degree murder); (“An attempt requires that the actor have specific intent to perform acts and attain a result which if accomplished would constitute the crime alleged.” (quotation omitted)), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A22-1552 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See, (“By intentionally driving his vehicle onto a sidewalk into a group of pedestrians, appellant used his vehicle as a dangerous weapon.”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
at 501, 506-07 (affirming conv iction for attempted first-degree murder under transferred intent doctrine); 562-64 (Minn. 2008) (applying doctrine to a ttempted first-degree murder conviction); -15 (Minn. App. 2013) (applyi ng doctrine to attempted second-degree murder conviction), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Arredondo v. State , -73 (Minn. 2008); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
He argues in his brief that “the doctrine of transferred intent cannot be used in a case involving attempted premeditated murder.” But this court has explicitly rej ected “[the] contention that t here can be no transferred intent from the attempted murder of a specific victim.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Bakdash , , 915 (Minn. App. 2013 ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-78 (Minn. 2006) (noting that intent can be transferred in first -degree premeditated murder cases); -14 (Minn. App. 2013) (discussing that “Minnesota caselaw has consistently applied the doctrine of transferred intent to specific-intent crimes”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Timothy Ayman Bakdash, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Timothy Ayman Bakdash v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Timothy Ayman Bakdash v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Scott Glass Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Scott Glass Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Cruz-Ramirez, d at 501, 506–07 (affirming attempted first-degree murder convictions based on transferred- intent doctrine); 562–64 (Minn. 2008) (affirming attempted first-degree murder conviction based on transferred-intent doctrine); –10, 912, 914–15 (Minn. App. 2013) (affirming attempted second-degree murder convictions and rejecting contention that “there can be no transferred intent from the attempted murder of a specific victim”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1(b) (2012); review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Joseph Deluney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Joseph Deluney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas John Rossiter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas John Rossiter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by