Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Uselman v. State, 831 N.W.2d 690.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph Robert Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Robert Clay
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
promise.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A guilty plea is considered involuntary “when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise, including a promise of a sentence unauthorized by law.” (quotations omitted).
- Alan Joseph Zakrajshek v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Alan Joseph Zakrajshek v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
sentence”); -25, 529 (Minn. 2003) (stating that the court’s “holding is limited to those situations where the original sentence did not include conditional release” and distinguishing cases “in which the district court failed to impose conditional release at sentencing and later amended the sentence to add the conditional release term”); -94 (Minn. App. 2013) (refusing to apply Rhodes because “[u]nlike the plea petition in Rhodes, which was silent 12 on conditional release, Uselman’s plea petiti
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
.” (d 678, 688 (Minn. 1997)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
7 A guilty plea is intelligent if a defendant “understands the charges against him, the rights he is waiving, and the consequences of his plea.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A plea is intelligent if it is made “knowingly and understandingly ,” Uselman v. State , (q uotation omitted), “with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences ,” Brady v. United States , 397 U.S. 742, 748 , 90 S. Ct. 1463, 1469 (1970).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise.” (quotation omitted).
-
Michael David Larson, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We review issues of law de novo and findings of fact for sufficiency of the evidence.”
-
Herbert Eugene Pitts, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A plea is intelligently made if a defendant “understands the charges against him, the rights he is waiving, and the consequences of his plea.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In Uselman v. State, this court concluded that the defendant “en tered his plea involuntarily on an erroneous understanding” and remanded to “t he district court to allow [the defendant] to withdraw his guilty plea.” -95 (Minn. App. 2013).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A guilty plea is involuntary “when it rests in any significa nt degree on an unfulf illed or unfulfillable promise.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A guilty plea is intelligent if a defendant “unde rstands the charges against him, the rights he is waiving, and the consequences of his plea.” Uselman v. State , d 690, 693 (Minn. App. 2013) (quoting Raleigh, d at 96) .
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise.” (quotation omitted); (“[A]n unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.”).
-
Erasmo Monge Rauda, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A n intelligent plea is one made ‘knowingly and understandingly.’” Uselman v. State , (quoting Perkins v. State , ).
- State of Minnesota v. Chaz Jacobi Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State of Minnesota v. Chaz Jacobi Beckman
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise.” (quotation omitted); (“[A]n unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.”).
- State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Armstrong
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests ‘in any significant degree’ on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise[.]” (-29 (Minn. 2005)).
- Craig Allan Hargreaves v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Craig Allan Hargreaves v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise, including a promise of a 8 sentence unauthorized by law.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise, including a promise of a sentence unauthorized by law.” (quotations omitted)).
- Anthony Lenard Vinegar v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Anthony Lenard Vinegar v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota
863 N.W.2d 88
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
ded a handwritten notation of the maximum penalty of 30 years imprisonment when the recommendation from the state was 115 months); Calmes, 8 d at 648 (stating that the defendant was “on notice that a statute required” a conditional-release term when the term was added and subsequently removed from the sentence); -94 (Minn. App. 2013) (concluding that when the plea agreement indicated that there would be no conditional- release term, plea withdrawal was appropriate).
- Joshua Zachary Matter v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Joshua Zachary Matter v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015