Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. A.S.E., 835 N.W.2d 513.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.J.C. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.J.C. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This is particularly true when we are tasked on appeal with reviewing the grant or denial of a juvenile expungement petition because section 260B.198, subdivision 6(b) contains a “detailed list of required considerations [which] enhances the need for specific findings to enable meaningful appellate review.” J.T.L., d at 338; (“While we appreciate the informality 4 of expungement proceedings, we are unable to review whether a grant or denial of expungement constitutes an abuse of discretion unles
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Discover Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that a correct result will not be reversed solely because the court’s stated reason was incorrect), aff’d, -18 (Minn. App. 2013) (independently weighing and rejecting constitutional claims for expungement).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Commissioner of Human Services, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Ramsey County, City of St. Paul v. R. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, Ramsey County, City of St. Paul v. R. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. J. E. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. J. E. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Factual findings are reviewed for clear error, and issues of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo, H.A.L., d at 478.
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF: J.T.L., Child 875 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF: J.T.L., Child 875 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
or making any findings of fact relevant to those factors.”
State of Minnesota v. E. M. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. E. M. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The district court has inherent authority to order expungement of criminal records held in the judicial branch as part of ‘the inherent power of the court to control its internal records.’” (quoting M.D.T., d at 282).
State of Minnesota v. T. J. Z. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. T. J. Z. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 513, 517-18 (Minn. App. 2013) (reversing and remanding for factual findings where district court failed to make specific findings).