Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., 842 N.W.2d 10.

44 citing documents.

Jenna Flick Susko v. Jacob Lee Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming entry of summary judgment when appellant’s brief on appeal did not challenge independent and sufficient ground for judgment), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Josh Campion, et al v. National Collegiate Athletics Association, The Big Ten Conference, Inc., The University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming entry of summary judgment when justified by independent and sufficient ground), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Ally Bank v. Serge N. Ngouambe Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Anda, see also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (“[A]n argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant’s principal brief is forfeited.”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
City of Blaine Police Department v. John Mark Luedtke Minn. Ct. App. 2026
is forfeited.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Solution Blue Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Hmong American Veterans Park Inc., Northwest Asphalt Inc., Rapp Land Surveying … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the certificate holders … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the certificate holders … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Application of Olson, d at 228; see Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Magnifi Financial Credit Union v. Harriet Lewis, The Patio Park Association, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
n.2 (Minn. 2015) (considering claims forfeited “because they were not addressed in Wayne’s briefs”); see also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (“[A]n argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant ’s principal brief is forfeited.”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Brianna Clerk v. HCMC Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Brianna Clerk v. HCMC Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Gerald Bernard, et al v. Wealth Enhancement Group LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Gerald Bernard, et al v. Wealth Enhancement Group LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming entry of summary judgment when appellant’s principal brief did not challenge independent and sufficient ground for judgment), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming grant of summary judgment where the district court provided two 13 independent and sufficient grounds for the grant and appellant did not challenge one of the grounds), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
First and Third Properties, LLC, et al v. Platinum Six, LLC, et al., Tricia Beckering, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming grant of summary judgment where district court provided two independent and sufficient grounds for the grant, and appellant did not challenge one of the grounds), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Aaron Olson v. Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County (CAPSH), State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Leave to amend ‘should be freely granted, except where to do so would result in prejudice to the other party.’” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., –18 (Minn. App. 2013) (), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Rebecca L Bersch v. Sharon K Hills Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Continental Clay Company Inc v. Foundry L.L.C. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Hortensia Salcedo Abad v. Jason Matthew Matasovsky Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This is so because “an argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant’s principal brief is forfeited.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Susanne Auleciems, Karl Auleciems v. Edina Realty Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(concluding that unchallenged reason for grant of summary-judgment motion was independent and sufficient reason for affirmance), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. A. H., C. B. P., Jr., and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, NA., review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Harold Specht Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Community Housing Services - Park Towers, Inc. v. Julie Gay Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
James Klingelhutz, individually and o/b/o the Klingelhutz Family Limited Partnership v. John Klingelhutz, Gary Klingelhutz Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Jill M. Larsen v. Wells Fargo Bank NA Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Ruiz, d at 56 (citing Moore); Jackson, d at 494 (same); Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (same), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Brandon Moore, et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems Inc., et al., May Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., 17 (Minn. A pp. 2013) (concluding that a fore closure sale was void because two separate mortgaged properties were sold in one fore closure sale in violation o f M i n n .
Gabrielle Huson, et al v. Benilde-St. Margaret’s School, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Mar.
ATP Holdings, LLC v. Curtis Trude, Martha Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Absent strict compliance with the foreclosure statute, the foreclosure proceeding is void.” Drews, d at 742; see also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank 898 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank 898 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“If separate parcels of mortgaged *658 property are not sold separately at a foreclosure sale, the foreclosure sale is void, without any need for the mortgagor to prove additional facts, such as fraud, prejudice, or good cause.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (Minn.App.
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Recoupment may be alleged as an affirmative defense in response to a mortgage foreclosure action in which the mortgage holder seeks damages.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Scott B. Lindholm v. Carleton College and third party plaintiff, vs. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, third party defendant Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Scott B. Lindholm v. Carleton College and third party plaintiff, vs. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, third party defendant Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck, et al 855 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck, et al 855 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., -18 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Eulogio Hernandez-Espinoza Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eulogio Hernandez-Espinoza Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Joyce M. Woelfel v. U. S. Bank, National Association Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, et al., Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, et al., Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (“[A]n argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant’s principal brief is forfeited.”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Joyce M. Woelfel v. U. S. Bank, National Association Minn. Ct. App. 2014
And “[t]he supreme court’s recent opinions on chapter 580 indicate that a failure to strictly comply with any statute in chapter 580 causes a foreclosure to be void.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., d 10, 15 (Minn. App. 2013) (citing Ruiz, d at 57-59, and Jackson, d at 493-501), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by