Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., 842 N.W.2d 10.

43 citing documents.

Josh Campion, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming entry of summary judgment when justified by independent and sufficient ground), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Ally Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Anda, see also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (“[A]n argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant’s principal brief is forfeited.”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
City of Blaine Police Department, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
is forfeited.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Solution Blue Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the certificate holders … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the certificate holders … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Application of Olson, d at 228; see Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Magnifi Financial Credit Union, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
n.2 (Minn. 2015) (considering claims forfeited “because they were not addressed in Wayne’s briefs”); see also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (“[A]n argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant ’s principal brief is forfeited.”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Brianna Clerk v. HCMC Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Brianna Clerk v. HCMC Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Gerald Bernard v. Wealth Enhancement Group LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Gerald Bernard v. Wealth Enhancement Group LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming entry of summary judgment when appellant’s principal brief did not challenge independent and sufficient ground for judgment), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming grant of summary judgment where the district court provided two 13 independent and sufficient grounds for the grant and appellant did not challenge one of the grounds), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
First and Third Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (affirming grant of summary judgment where district court provided two independent and sufficient grounds for the grant, and appellant did not challenge one of the grounds), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Aaron Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Leave to amend ‘should be freely granted, except where to do so would result in prejudice to the other party.’” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., –18 (Minn. App. 2013) (), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Rebecca L Bersch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Continental Clay Company Inc, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This is so because “an argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant’s principal brief is forfeited.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Susanne Auleciems, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(concluding that unchallenged reason for grant of summary-judgment motion was independent and sufficient reason for affirmance), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. A. H., C. B. P., Jr., and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, NA., review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Community Housing Services - Park Towers, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
James Klingelhutz, individually and o/b/o the Klingelhutz Family Limited Partnership, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Jill M. Larsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Ruiz, d at 56 (citing Moore); Jackson, d at 494 (same); Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (same), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Brandon Moore, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., 17 (Minn. A pp. 2013) (concluding that a fore closure sale was void because two separate mortgaged properties were sold in one fore closure sale in violation o f M i n n .
Gabrielle Huson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Mar.
ATP Holdings, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Absent strict compliance with the foreclosure statute, the foreclosure proceeding is void.” Drews, d at 742; see also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank 898 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank 898 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“If separate parcels of mortgaged *658 property are not sold separately at a foreclosure sale, the foreclosure sale is void, without any need for the mortgagor to prove additional facts, such as fraud, prejudice, or good cause.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (Minn.App.
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Recoupment may be alleged as an affirmative defense in response to a mortgage foreclosure action in which the mortgage holder seeks damages.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Scott B. Lindholm v. Carleton College, and third party v. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, third-party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Scott B. Lindholm v. Carleton College, and third party v. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, third-party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck 855 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck 855 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., -18 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Eulogio Hernandez-Espinoza Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eulogio Hernandez-Espinoza Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
Joyce M. Woelfel v. U. S. Bank, National Association Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See also Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., (“[A]n argument for reversal that is not raised in an appellant’s principal brief is forfeited.”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Joyce M. Woelfel v. U. S. Bank, National Association Minn. Ct. App. 2014
And “[t]he supreme court’s recent opinions on chapter 580 indicate that a failure to strictly comply with any statute in chapter 580 causes a foreclosure to be void.” Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., d 10, 15 (Minn. App. 2013) (citing Ruiz, d at 57-59, and Jackson, d at 493-501), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by