Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Civil Commitment of Moen, 837 N.W.2d 40.

43 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Loyd Ivey Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Loyd Ivey Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Rule 60.02(e) consists of three clauses, which provide three legal bases for relief.”
Jenna Marie Benzinger v. Roger Tabet Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Jenna Marie Benzinger v. Roger Tabet Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Commitment of Moen, -45 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Guy Israel Greene. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Commitment of Moen, rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett Urbanek Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett Urbanek Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Commitment of Moen, -49 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of: Michael Dale Benson. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Commitment of Moen, ( n.3 (Minn. App. 1995), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. 2025
Swope, d at 57 (–51 (Minn. App. 2013)).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Allan aka Peter Allan George Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Allan aka Peter Allan George Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Commitment of Moen, -49 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Commitment of Moen, –51 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Eric Matthew Flanders. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See In re Civil Commitment of Moen , -48 (Minn. App. 2013) (discussing the availability of a habeas corpus or federal civil rights claim to challenge inadequate 12 treatment), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jesse Nikolas Rowland. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Id.; -46 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Randal Ashman. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The goal of st atutory interpretation is to “ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.” Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2020); d 46, 50 (Minn. 2020) (applying Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2018)); (applying this idea in a commitment appeal).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: William Lee Erickson. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A]n evidentiary hearing is merely a procedural means by which a district court may determine whether a party is entitled to relief.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: James Allen Sleen Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Moen , d 40, 46-47 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Larry Franklin Dean. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2c (2018), a “rule 60.02 motion is not a ‘proceeding’ under the Commitment Act, as that term is used in section 253B.07, subdivision 2c.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Justin Allen Newman. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2c (2018) , a “rule 60.02 motion is not a ‘proceeding’ under the Commitment Act, as that term is used in section 253B.07, subdivision 2c.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Daniel A. Wilson. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See In re Civil Commitment of Moen , , 43, 50-51, 50 n.2 (Minn. App. 2013) (stating that a patient who has been committed as an SDP does not have a statutory right to counsel under Minn. Stat. § 253B.07, subd.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Eugene Dooley. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
5 Appellant also argues that he had a right to counsel for purpo ses of his motion to “withdraw stipulation as a SDP.” Notwithstanding that a civilly committed person has no right to counsel in a challenge to the commitment brought under rule 60.02, In re Civil Commitment of Moen , review denied (Minn. Oct.
650 North Main Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4-45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Robert Archie Kunshier Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In 8 re Civil Commitment of Moen , -45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Allan aka Peter Allan George Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: David Leroy Gamble, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: David Leroy Gamble, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
–45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Steven Daywitt. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Steven Daywitt. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An evidentiary hearing on a rule 60.02 motion “is not a form of relief in and of itself.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Gerard Lonergan. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Gerard Lonergan. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil COMMITMENT OF Kenneth Donald HAND 878 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Steven Merrill Hogy. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Steven Merrill Hogy. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at *1 ( review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil COMMITMENT OF Kenneth Donald HAND 878 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
.In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Hollis John Larson. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
.In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Hollis John Larson. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-45 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Walter Bathel. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Walter Bathel. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The elements of proof at a commitment trial do not implicate the efficacy of treatment in the MSOP.” review denied (Minn. Oct.