DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598.

356 citing documents.

  • Raymond L. Semler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and cons true all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.”
  • Wayne Nicolaison, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    d 598, 606 (Minn. 2014).
  • Eric Reetz, Minn. 2021
    And we “do not add words or phrases to unambiguous statutes.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, et al., Minn. 2021
  • Deborah Lynn Nichols, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “When interpreting a rule, we look first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Glacier Park Iron Ore Properties, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • A20-0958 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    1 Although the statute does not define the phrase “a matter that has no merit,” a district court cannot dismiss a civil petition without a hearing on the merits unless “it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (quoting N. States Power Co. v. Franklin , ).
  • Tyler Halva, Minn. 2021
    Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Joseph Anthony Favors, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • Landmark Bank, N.A., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    In particular, appellant highlights the supreme court’s holding in Walsh v. US. Bank, stating that “Minnesota is a notice-pleading state and does not require absolute specificity in pleading, but rather requires only information sufficient to fairly notify the opposing party of the claim against it.” - 605 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omit ted).
  • Erik Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Living Word Christian Church, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    The purpose of the complaint is to “‘give fair notice to the adverse party of the incident giving rise to the suit with sufficient clarity to disc lose the pleader’s theory upon which his claim for relief is based.’” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., ( (emphasis added in Walsh)).
  • Steven Dahl, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • St. Cloud Educational Rights Advocacy Council, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    d 598, 606 (Minn. 2014).
  • Brandon Trennepohl, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    P. 12.02(e), this c ourt reviews de novo “whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, (citation omitted).
  • Christina Ginther, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Minnesota is a notice-pleading state and does not require absolute specificity in pleading, but rather requires only information sufficient to fairly notify the opposing party of the claim against it.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A , d 598, 604-05 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
  • Katherine Marie Doornbos, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Minnesota is a notice-pleading state and does not require absolute specificity in pleading, but rather requires only information sufficient to fairly notify the opposing party of the claim against it.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., -05 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
  • N.H., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
  • 40 Ventures LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Dwaine C. Ratfield, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    This court revi ews de novo “whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Community Finance Group, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Jane S. Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    10 N.A., (“[W]e do not add words or phrases to unambiguous statutes or rules.”).
  • Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
  • A p p e l l a n t s , Minn. 2020
    See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Allstate Indemnity Company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and constru e all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A .
  • Safeco Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    7 The first step in interpreting court rules requires looking “to the plain language of the rule.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Minn. 2020
    A claim survives a motion to dismiss “if it is poss ible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader's theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Dustin Ward, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Save Lake Calhoun, Minn. 2020
    See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Stacey Marable, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
  • Blue Sky Real Estate, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
  • Brad Ronald Stevens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    We accept the f acts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
  • Andrew Cilek, et al., Minn. 2020
    “[W]e do not add words or phrases to unambiguous statutes or rules.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Scott H. Lansing, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Washington International Insurance Company, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Friends of Tower Hill Park, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
  • Carol Gorman, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true 4 and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
  • William Furlow, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., .
  • Zayna Shire, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    Appellate courts “accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Tyler Halva, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    6 reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
  • William DeRosa, Minn. 2019
    DeRosa’s appointment was “ poorly received” by Craig McKenzie, the chief executive officer and 1 When reviewing a district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, “[ w]e accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
  • Donald Hall, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    P. 12.02(e), a pleading may be dismissed for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” “A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’ s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., .
  • William A. McClendon, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    D E C I S I O N On appeal from the dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(e), we review de novo whether the complaint “sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (Minn .
  • Wayne P. Steffens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “We review de novo whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N .A.
  • In the Matter of: The Trusteeship Created by the Port Authority of the City of St. Paul Relating … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (Minn .
  • Minn. 2019
  • Meagan Abel, Appellant, vs. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, et al., Respondents, St. Mary's University Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., d 598, 603 (Minn. 2014).
  • Minn. 2019
    In my view, the answer to that question is “yes.” “A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., .
  • Ashen S. Diehl, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    P. 12.02(e), a pleading may be dismissed for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” “A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might b e produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.