Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598.

362 citing documents.

James Jesse Hunter v. Kim Coughlin, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Richard W Bandimere, et al v. Anita Summerville, A Summerville Realty Corporation d/b/a Summerville Realty Group Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
MCHS Red Wing v. Brittney N. Converse Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Patrice Nerad (A20-1111) (A20-1212), and Frederic W. Knaak, et al. Appellants (A20-1212) v. Martin Chalupa, et al., Edina … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Free Minnesota Small Business Coalition, et al v. Tim Walz Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Minn. 2021
Raymond L. Semler v. Eastbay Inc., Unknown Jane and John Does at the Minnesota Sex Offender Program Moose … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and cons true all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.”
Wayne Nicolaison v. Peter Puffer, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 598, 606 (Minn. 2014).
Eric Reetz, Minn. 2021
And we “do not add words or phrases to unambiguous statutes.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, et al., Minn. 2021
Deborah Lynn Nichols v. Scott Gerald Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“When interpreting a rule, we look first to the plain language of the rule and its purpose.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Glacier Park Iron Ore Properties, LLC v. United States Steel Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Matthew James Beland v. Heidi Hamre-Rylander (A20-0957), Kurtis Rylander (A20-0958) Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1 Although the statute does not define the phrase “a matter that has no merit,” a district court cannot dismiss a civil petition without a hearing on the merits unless “it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (quoting N. States Power Co. v. Franklin , ).
Tyler Halva v. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Minn. 2021
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Joseph Anthony Favors v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., Alltran Financial LP, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Landmark Bank, N.A. v. John Klingelhutz, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In particular, appellant highlights the supreme court’s holding in Walsh v. US. Bank, stating that “Minnesota is a notice-pleading state and does not require absolute specificity in pleading, but rather requires only information sufficient to fairly notify the opposing party of the claim against it.” - 605 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omit ted).
Erik Peterson v. Deborah Ellis, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Living Word Christian Church v. Church Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The purpose of the complaint is to “‘give fair notice to the adverse party of the incident giving rise to the suit with sufficient clarity to disc lose the pleader’s theory upon which his claim for relief is based.’” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., ( (emphasis added in Walsh)).
Steven Dahl v. Pamela Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
St. Cloud Educational Rights Advocacy Council v. Tim Walz, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 598, 606 (Minn. 2014).
Brandon Trennepohl v. DeLaSalle High School, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 12.02(e), this c ourt reviews de novo “whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, (citation omitted).
Christina Ginther v. Enzuri Group, LLC, et al. on Related Appeal, Independent Women’s Football League on Related Appeal Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Minnesota is a notice-pleading state and does not require absolute specificity in pleading, but rather requires only information sufficient to fairly notify the opposing party of the claim against it.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A , d 598, 604-05 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
Katherine Marie Doornbos, vs, Kyle Justice Yaedke, St. Paul Federal Credit Union, et al., Nominal Defendants Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Minnesota is a notice-pleading state and does not require absolute specificity in pleading, but rather requires only information sufficient to fairly notify the opposing party of the claim against it.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., -05 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
N.H., and Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights-intervenor v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
40 Ventures LLC v. Minnesquam, L.L.C., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Dwaine C. Ratfield, et al v. South Harbor Township, Robert Zuckerman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
This court revi ews de novo “whether a complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Community Finance Group, Inc. v. Main Street Otsego, LLC, LandCor Companies, Inc., Robert L. Fields, Patricia Fields, ABP, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Jane S. Doe v. Kelly Kirby, Winona State University, HTC Counselling, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
State of Minnesota v. Deonte Darnell Lawson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
10 N.A., (“[W]e do not add words or phrases to unambiguous statutes or rules.”).
Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
A p p e l l a n t s , Minn. 2020
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Allstate Indemnity Company, et al v. Twin Cities Diagnostic Center, L.L.C., et al., Precision Toxicology, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and constru e all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A .
Safeco Insurance Company v. Holmgren Building Repair, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
7 The first step in interpreting court rules requires looking “to the plain language of the rule.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Minn. 2020
A claim survives a motion to dismiss “if it is poss ible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader's theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Dustin Ward, et al v. El Rancho Manana, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Save Lake Calhoun, Minn. 2020
See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Stacey Marable v. City of Minneapolis, Noah Schuchman, et al., Minneapolis Public Housing Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Blue Sky Real Estate, LLC v. Sunrise Banks, N.A., f/k/a University National Bank successor by merger with Park … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Brad Ronald Stevens v. Emily Johnson Piper, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We accept the f acts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
Andrew Cilek, et al., Minn. 2020
“[W]e do not add words or phrases to unambiguous statutes or rules.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Scott H. Lansing v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Washington International Insurance Company v. Hannaya Health Care Inc., et al. and third-party plaintiffs, vs. State of Minnesota, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Carol Gorman v. SEIU Healthcare Minnesota, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true 4 and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
Friends of Tower Hill Park v. Foxfire Properties, LLC, et al., Vermilion Enterprises, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
William Furlow v. Madonna Summit of Byron, Jane Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., .
Zayna Shire, et al v. Jodi Harpstead Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Appellate courts “accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Tyler Halva v. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Minn. Ct. App. 2019
6 reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (citation omitted).
William DeRosa, Minn. 2019
DeRosa’s appointment was “ poorly received” by Craig McKenzie, the chief executive officer and 1 When reviewing a district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, “[ w]e accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Donald Hall v. City of Plainview Minn. Ct. App. 2019
P. 12.02(e), a pleading may be dismissed for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” “A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’ s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., .
William A. McClendon v. Thomas Roy, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N On appeal from the dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(e), we review de novo whether the complaint “sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., (Minn .