Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond Struzyk, 869 N.W.2d 280.

114 citing documents.

State v. Jama 923 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 2019
State v. Jama 923 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 2019
State v. Struzyk , , 284 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Ortega-Rodriguez 920 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2018
State v. Ortega-Rodriguez 920 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2018
State v. Henderson , , 625 (Minn. 2018) (citing State v. Struzyk , , 284 (Minn. 2015) ); see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2018).
In re Qwest Corp. 918 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Qwest Corp. 918 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Struzyk , , 288 n.5 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
.” see, (finding sufficient evidence of bodily harm based on a bruise); (concluding there was sufficient evidence to constitute bodily harm when victim experienced pain from being struck and
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Struzyk , , 287 (Minn. 2015) (stating that appellate courts "read and construe a statute as a whole and interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections"); *110 Minn. Transitions Charter Sch.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 2018
State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC v. Comm'r of Revenue 916 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 2018
State v. Struzyk , , 284 (Minn. 2015) (citation omitted).
State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
Under the whole-statute canon, "we read [the Guidelines] as a whole and interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections," Kirby , d at 493 , in an effort "to avoid conflicting interpretations," State v. Struzyk , , 287 (Minn. 2015).
Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of Revenue 914 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 2018
Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of Revenue 914 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 2018
State v. Struzyk , , 284-85 (Minn. 2015) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Clarin 913 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Clarin 913 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Struzyk , , 289 (Minn. 2015) (state bears the burden of proving all elements of crime beyond a reasonable doubt).
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
State v. Struzyk , , 284-85 (Minn. 2015) (quoting State v. Rick , , 482 (Minn. 2013) ).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2018
Minn. 2018
“If the Legislature’s intent is clear from the statute’s plain and unambiguous language, then we interpret the statute according to its plain meaning without resorting to the canons of statutory construction.” –85 (Minn. 2015); Christianson, d at 537 (“[O]ur role is to enforce the language of the statute and 7 not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“It is axiomatic that it is the State’s burden to prove every element of the charged offense.”).
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
293 n.1 (Minn. 2015) (Stras, J., concurring) (“By adding the adverb ‘physically’ to the word ‘assaults,’ the statute indicates that the act underlying the assault must be physical in nature....
Appeal of Krenik 903 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 2017
Appeal of Krenik 903 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 2017
Moreover, Krenik’s interpretation is inconsistent with the whole-statute canon, which requires us to “read and construe a statute as a whole.”
Lapenotiere v. State 902 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lapenotiere v. State 902 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Halvorson v. B&F Fastener Supply 901 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2017
Halvorson v. B&F Fastener Supply 901 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2017
(adopting an interpretation of a statute that avoided surplusage).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1 (providing that domestic assault is assault committed “against a family or household member as defined in [Minnesota Statutes] section 518B.01, subdivision 2 ”); (“It is axiomatic that it is the State’ s burden to prove every element of the charged 1 Domestic assault is a felony if it is committed “within ten years of the first of any combination of two or more previous qualified domestic violence -related off
State v. Thonesavanh 904 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2017
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Again, absent ambiguity, this court does not “resort to legislative history to interpret a statute.” , 288 n.5 (Minn. 2015) (quotation omitted).
Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 892 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 2017
Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 892 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Galen Dale Littlewind Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Galen Dale Littlewind Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lowell Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lowell Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“It is axiomatic that it is the State’s burden to prove every element of the charged offense.”
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald David Olson 884 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald David Olson 884 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016