Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce Martin, 849 N.W.2d 99.

25 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When a district 2 Although not relevant here, under certain circumstances a district court may also approve a continuance for dismissal, whereby “[t]he district court does not make a finding of guilt, and the defendant does not make an admission of guilt.” d 99, 103 (Minn. App. 2014) (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
DECISION A stay of adjudication is a procedure in which “the district court, upon a defendant’s guilty plea or a fact-finder’s determination of guilt, does not adjudicate the defendant guilty but imposes conditions of probation.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Daniel A. Vogel, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In fact, 3 A stay of adjudication “is a procedure whereby the district court, upon a defendant’s guilty plea or a fact-finder’s determination of guilt, does not adjudicate the defendant guilty but imposes conditions of probation.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A stay of adjudication “is a procedure whereby the district court, upon a defendant’s guilty plea or a fact-finder’s determination of guilt, does not adjudicate the defendant guilty but imposes conditions of probation.” State v. Martin , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N When a district court stays adjudication, the defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty, but the court “does not adjudicate the defendant guilty [and instead] imposes conditions of probation.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Commissioner of Human Services, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A stay of adjudication “is a procedure whereby the district court, upon a defendant’s guilty plea or a fact -finder’s determination of guilt, does not adjudicate the defendant guilty but imposes conditions of probation.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
A17-0934 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
–02 (Minn. App. 2010) (explaining that the applicable caselaw governing stays of adjudication and continuances for dismissal is the same); review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
I t is well established that a stay of adjudication flow s from a determination of guilt, review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Braden Jay Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Braden Jay Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1(2)(b); (explaining difference between stays of execution, imposition, and adjudication), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. E. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. E. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“If a district court orders a stay of adjudication, and if the defendant successfully completes probation, the defendant avoids a criminal conviction.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-03 (Minn. App. 2014), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Louis Gollop Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Charles Louis Gollop Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 541; (reversing district court’s order staying adjudication in part because the facts noted by the district court were 1 Gollop did not file a brief in this appeal.
State of Minnesota v. S. A. M. 877 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. S. A. M. 877 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A feature unique to a stay of imposition is that, upon a person’s successful completion of probation, a felony or gross misdemeanor conviction may be reduced in degree[.]” Minn. Stat. § 609.13, subd.