Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Goerke Family Partnership, Donald Shelstad v. Lac qui Parle-Yellow Bank Watershed Distric…, 857 N.W.2d 50.

19 citing documents.

Lake West Development LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Todd A. Wiederich, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Goerke Family P’ -53 (Minn. App. 2014).
Aaron Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Zutz Farms, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Larry Koch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
P’ship v. Lac qui Parle -Yellow Bank Watershed Dist., - 53 (Minn. App. 2014).
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
P’-53 (Minn. App. 2014).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
P’ship v. Lac qui Parle -Yellow Bank Watershed Dist., –53 (Minn. App. 2014) .
State of Minnesota, by Spring Valley Friends, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
P’- 54 (Minn. App. 2014) (reasoning that the statutory language in the second to last sentence means that “the district court is limited on appeal to review of the record made before the board of managers”).
Teresa M. Hintze, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
P’d 50, 54 (Minn. App. 2014); see Sheehan v. Flynn, 61 N.W.
Croix Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Peter Stalland, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
P’d 50, 55 (Minn. App. 2014).
A18-0170 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Goerke Family P’–53 (Minn. App. 2014) (citing In re Welfare of S.M.E.
S. Robideau Construction, Inc. v. John E. Hiber, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
S. Robideau Construction, Inc. v. John E. Hiber, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review a district court’s decision to allow a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion.” Goerke Family P’–53 (Minn. App. 2014) ().
In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Patricia Annette Wallace, Protected Person. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Patricia Annette Wallace, Protected Person. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Goerke Family P’-53 (Minn. App. 2014).
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota has adopted the reasonable-use doctrine which “permits a property owner to drain surface waters onto another’s land if the elements of the reasonable-use doctrine are met.” Goerke Family P’