Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Larry Leo Geleneau, Jr., 873 N.W.2d 373.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of the right to challenge a prospective juror for cause” and “relieve[s] the district court of any obligation to dismiss any juror for cause sua sponte.” rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The state urges us to conclude that Alonzo waived this argument, rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
178, 180 (Minn. 1923) (“By proceeding with the trial to a final conclusion without objection and with full knowledge of the facts, defendant waived whatever right he may have had to challenge the competency of the jurors.”); (declining to consider appellant’s “argument that the district court erred by not dismissing two prospective jurors for cause sua sponte because [appellant at trial] expressly waived his right to assert a challenge for cause”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
-
Alexander James Ray, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If a district court has ruled on a for-cause challenge to a prospective juror, an appellate court gives great deference to a district court’s findings of fact regarding juror bias and reviews a district court’s decision to seat a juror for abuse of discretion.” (quotations omitted), rev denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
challenge” to the juror); see also Stufflebean, d at 317 (stating that an appellant must challenge the juror for cause to preserve the issue for appeal); (same), review denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2 (holding that failing to object to j ury panel at trial constitutes waiver of right to raise biased-juror argument on appeal).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
n.3 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
-
Faron Wayne Ruel, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Geleneau , review denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
–82 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Geleneau , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
n.1 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Mar.
- State of Minnesota v. Kevin Ray Goulet Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Ray Goulet
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
n.1 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
- State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr. 884 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr.
884 N.W.2d 878
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This court has recently held that it “will not consider whether a district court erred by not striking a juror for cause sua sponte if the appellant expressly waived the right to challenge the juror for cause.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
- State of Minnesota v. Tyrese Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Tyrese Thomas
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
ror and “[s]tructural errors always invalidate a conviction whether or not a timely objection to the error was made.” Consistent with the state’s contention, this court has recently held that it “will not consider whether a district court erred by not striking a juror for cause sua sponte if the appellant expressly waived the right to challenge the juror for cause.” pet.