Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Larry Leo Geleneau, Jr., 873 N.W.2d 373.

20 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Travis Joel Bauer Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of the right to challenge a prospective juror for cause” and “relieve[s] the district court of any obligation to dismiss any juror for cause sua sponte.” rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Brian James Krutchek Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. David NMN Alonzo Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The state urges us to conclude that Alonzo waived this argument, rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Mal Pauliet Tharjiath Minn. Ct. App. 2023
178, 180 (Minn. 1923) (“By proceeding with the trial to a final conclusion without objection and with full knowledge of the facts, defendant waived whatever right he may have had to challenge the competency of the jurors.”); (declining to consider appellant’s “argument that the district court erred by not dismissing two prospective jurors for cause sua sponte because [appellant at trial] expressly waived his right to assert a challenge for cause”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Alexander James Ray v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If a district court has ruled on a for-cause challenge to a prospective juror, an appellate court gives great deference to a district court’s findings of fact regarding juror bias and reviews a district court’s decision to seat a juror for abuse of discretion.” (quotations omitted), rev denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Deshaun Collins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
challenge” to the juror); see also Stufflebean, d at 317 (stating that an appellant must challenge the juror for cause to preserve the issue for appeal); (same), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Steven Douglas Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2 (holding that failing to object to j ury panel at trial constitutes waiver of right to raise biased-juror argument on appeal).
State of Minnesota v. Meng Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2019
n.3 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Faron Wayne Ruel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Geleneau , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Clifton Dale Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
–82 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Illya Cotten Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Geleneau , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Chris Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan David Janssen Minn. Ct. App. 2018
n.1 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Lee Bellanger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Ray Goulet Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Ray Goulet Minn. Ct. App. 2017
n.1 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr. 884 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr. 884 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This court has recently held that it “will not consider whether a district court erred by not striking a juror for cause sua sponte if the appellant expressly waived the right to challenge the juror for cause.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Tyrese Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tyrese Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2016
ror and “[s]tructural errors always invalidate a conviction whether or not a timely objection to the error was made.” Consistent with the state’s contention, this court has recently held that it “will not consider whether a district court erred by not striking a juror for cause sua sponte if the appellant expressly waived the right to challenge the juror for cause.” pet.