Cited by

This court has held that, when a defendant pleads guilty “under a negotiated plea for a definite-term sentence” and is not sufficiently notified of a mandatory conditional-release term, “[d]ue process requires that [the defendant] have the opportunity to withdraw [her] plea.” (emphasis added).

rict court amended defendant’s sentence to include conditional-release term) ; -45 (Minn. 2000) (determining that sentencing court must either modify sentence or allow guilty plea to be withdrawn when defendant is subject to mandatory conditional release that effectively increases their sentence beyond court-accept ed plea agreement); (“When a statute mandates a period of conditional release, any sentence that omits the conditional -release period is unauthorized.”); Stone, d at 634-35 (concludi

hese two statements to argue that his counsel did not advise him about lifetime conditional release, which he asserts is a direct consequence, 2 and lifetime predatory-offender registration, which he 2 This court has recognized that conditional release is generally a direct consequence of a plea “because it affects the maximum amount of prison time a defendant may serve.”

Conditional-release terms mandated by statute “cannot be waived.” n.3 (Minn. App. 2015).

Such periods of conditional release mandated by statute “cannot be waived.” d 88, 92 n.3 (Minn. App. 2015).

“When a statute mandates a period of conditional release, any sentence that omits the conditional-release period is unauthorized.” Kubrom v. State

A conditional-release term is generally a direct consequence of a plea “because it affects the maximum amount of prison time a defendant may serve.”

“A postconviction petition is proper to seek withdrawal of a guilty plea after the time for a direct appeal has expired.”

“[A]ny sentence that omits the conditional -release 10 period is unauthorized.”

This court again addressed the issue of guilty -plea withdrawal premised on imposition of a

Minnesota courts have consistently held that “when a defendant is informed of a possible conditional-release term before sentencing, even if that term is not in the plea agreement or sentence, the defendant has sufficient notice of the consequences of the plea and the plea will be considered to have been voluntary and intelligent.” -48 (Minn.2001) (providing that defendant was “on notice that a statute required that he serve a conditional release term” when term was added and subsequently remove

to conclude that respondent did not have constructive notice under the DWI statute, and generally noted that “[i]f constructive notice alone was enough to defeat a request for postconviction relief, there would be no basis for the fairly regular litigation in this area.” We agree.