Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services, 883 N.W.2d 561.

81 citing documents.

Dannielle Zephier, Minn. 2021
Robert Martsching, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Harlow v. Dep’t of Human Servs.
Tammy Ann Harris, and on behalf of Margaret M. Banks, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Taofeek Ishola, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Highland Management Group Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We review a district court’s ap plication of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Christensen Law Office, PLLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We review a district court’s a pplication of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Linda Gensmer, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Sendecky, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Calm Waters, LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We review a district court’s application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
William DeRosa, Minn. 2019
Harlow v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Robert F. Goerdt, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We review a district court’s application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. Dep’t of Human Servs.
Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
Lawrence Paul St. Marie, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We review a district court’s application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Linnihan Foy Advertising, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rochester City Lines Co., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Harlow v. State Dep’t. of Human Servs.
Neil N. Lapidus, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“We review a district court’s application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 910 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 910 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dering Pierson Group, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Harlow v. State Dep’t of Human Servs ., -70 (M inn.
John S. Drewitz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Harlow v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Saido M. Ali, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A. 890 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A. 890 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Harlow v. State Dep’t of Human Servs., aff’d in part, rev’d in part, and remanded
KSTP-TV v. Metropolitan Council 884 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2016
KSTP-TV v. Metropolitan Council 884 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2016
See Harlow v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., (applying the presumption to reach a similar conclusion).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by