Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services, 883 N.W.2d 561.

81 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application of Andrew Wheeler for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minnesota Coalition on Government Information, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Harlow v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
A25-1102 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., -68 (Minn. 2016) (noting that duplicative data maintained by an entity can be both public and private at the same time depending on the category and classification accorded the data under applicable sections of the MGDPA).
Kareem INC v. Property Seized by Minnesota Department of Revenue in Goodhue County, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kareem INC v. Property Seized by Minnesota Department of Revenue in Goodhue County, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Thaleaha McBee v. Team Industries, Inc. Minn. 2025
Thaleaha McBee v. Team Industries, Inc. Minn. 2025
Servs., –70 (Minn. 2016) (same).
Minn. 2025
Servs., –70 (Minn. 2016) (same).
All Around Property Preservation, LLC v. Ronald Clark, Bank of America, N.A., ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
All Around Property Preservation, LLC v. Ronald Clark, Bank of America, N.A., ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., d 561, 568 (Minn. 2016).
In the Matter of the Arthur F. Symens Revocable Trust created September 21, 2016 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Arthur F. Symens Revocable Trust created September 21, 2016 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Sustainable 9, LLC d/b/a Sustainable 9 Design + Build, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Eugene and Sandra Alexander, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Constance M Johnson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A24-1331 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Tyrone Murphy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
In the Matter of the Application of Jesus Adrian Soto for a Change of Name of Minor. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Alpha News, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2014)); see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2024).
In re the Guardianship of: Doris Anita Seward. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., (regarding application of law).
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Servs., Roemhildt v. Kristall Dev., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. July 19, 2011).
Robert Jensen v. Carl Rindelaub Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert Jensen v. Carl Rindelaub Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Jill Lee Osufsen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Liberte Construction, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of Katie Ann Pyka On Behalf Of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., (holding that appellate courts review the district court’s application of the law de novo).
Energy Policy Advocates, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., -09 (Minn. 2021).
Roger Dean Olson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Anthony Novak, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lariat Companies Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., (stating that appellate courts review de novo a district court’s application of law).
Arctos Wealth Management and Fiduciary LLC, o/b/o Irvin John Cooper, Sr., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Marthamae Kottschade, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts “review a district court’s application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Belle Plaine MHP, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. 2022
Servs., (“acknowledg[ing] that it may seem anomalous to have data classified as public for one purpose, and confidential for another purpose”).
JanOne Inc., formerly known as Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Byron Johnson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Doran-CSM SE I LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Minn. Stat. § 484.013, 6 of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Landmark Community Bank, N.A., now doing business as Flagship Bank Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We review a district court’s application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Hermann Horst, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs., (noting that relevant facts are undisputed).
Everest Stables, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A20-1369 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.
Ronald J. Bardine, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
8 application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. Dep’t of Human Servs.
Sandra D’Antonio, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We review a district court’s application of the law de novo.” Harlow v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs.