Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDaniels, 875 N.W.2d 279.

52 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc., see also Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., (stating that an appeal should be dismissed as moot “when intervening events render a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible”).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But it is unnecessary to look to the dictionary definition in this instance because the legislature has provided a definition of “manufacture.” See Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., (“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definition provided by the Legislature”; “[w]hen there is no applicable statutory definition, we often consult dictionary definitions to discern a word’s plain meaning.”).
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Clifford Robert Letourneau, III, Appellant Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Clifford Robert Letourneau, III, Appellant Minn. 2025
7 (2024); see also Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., (“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definition provided by the Legislature.”).
Minn. 2025
7 (2024); see also Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., (“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definition provided by the Legislature.”).
In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent Minn. 2025
In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent Minn. 2025
Minnesota Statutes section 256B.02, subdivision 8 (2024), defines “medical assistance” as “payment of part or all of the cost of the care and services identified in section 256B.0625, for eligible individuals whose income and resources are insufficient to meet all of this cost.” See Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., (stating that when a word is defined by statute, we apply that definition).
In the Matter of the Formal Complaint and Request for Relief by the Minnesota Solar Advocates. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(rejecting a “literal interpretation” of a statutory definition that “makes no sense in the context of the greater statutory scheme”), aff’d, cf. Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., (stating that the Minnesota Supreme Court has “ignored a statutory definition only when applying the definition would violate our canons of statutory interpretation”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kyaw Be Bee, Appellant Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kyaw Be Bee, Appellant Minn. 2025
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., 7 (Minn. 2016).
In the Matter of QC Training Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Daley Farm of Lewiston, L.L.P., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definition provided by the Legislature.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Dakota Drug, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator Minn. 2024
Dakota Drug, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator Minn. 2024
See Wayzata Nissan, (“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definition provided by the Legislature.”).
Anthony Novak, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appeal should be dismissed as moot “when intervening events render a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Deklin Darren Goeden, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.
Jessica Hagen, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Minn. 2021
“When a word is defined in a statute, courts are guided by the definition provided by the Legislature.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
A21-0035 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“But an appeal is not moot when a party could be afforded effective relief.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.
State of Minnesota, by Jan Malcolm, Commissioner of Health, in her Official capacity, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
But “an appeal is not moot when a party could be afforded effective relief.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Eric John Blehr, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
To ascertain the plain meaning of a word, appellate courts “often consult dictionary definitions.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
A19-1701 A19-1702 A19-1703 Minn. 2020
“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definition provided by the Legislature.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
In re the Marriage of: John Sterling Ross, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Kristina Greene, et al., Minn. 2020
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Concurring, Anderson, J., Gildea, C.J. Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Minn. 2020
“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definition pr ovided by the Legislature.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
A18-1615 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We review the issue of mootness de novo.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
In re Restorff 932 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 2019
In re Restorff 932 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 2019
See Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc. , , 286 (Minn. 2016) ("When there is no applicable statutory definition, we often consult dictionary definitions to discern a word's plain meaning."
Moore v. City of New Brighton 932 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Moore v. City of New Brighton 932 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc. , , 284 (Minn. 2016).
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 929 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2019
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson 929 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2019
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc. , , 286 (Minn. 2016).
A17-1958 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
But an appeal 6 is not moot when a party could be afforded effective relief.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc. , ; see Sprenger v. Jacobs , (“It is well settled that if, pending an appeal, an event occurs which makes a decision unnecessary, the appeal will be dismissed as presenting a moot question.”).
Verhein v. Piper 917 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Verhein v. Piper 917 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc. , , 283 (Minn. 2016) (citations omitted).
In the Matter of the Maltreatment Determination of Amanda Restorff and the Order to Pay a Fine and … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., (“When a word is defined in a statute, we are guided by the definit ion provided by the Legislature”[;] “ [w]hen there is no applicable statutory definition, we often consult dictionary definitions to discern a word’s plain meaning.”).
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellate courts review the issue of mootness de novo, Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., and review a denial of default judgment for abuse of discretion, Black, d at 525 .
Phone Recovery Services, LLC v. Qwest Corp. 901 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Phone Recovery Services, LLC v. Qwest Corp. 901 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The statute does not define “pending.” “When there is no applicable statutory definition, [this court] often con-sultes] dictionary definitions to discern a word’s plain meaning.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Aeon, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The purpose of statutory interpretation is to ascertain the intent of the Legislature.” Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc. , d 279, 285 (Minn. 2016).
Vermillion State Bank v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation 895 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vermillion State Bank v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation 895 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The statute does not define “such person.” “When there is no applicable statutory definition, [this court] often consults] dictionary definitions to discern a word’s plain meaning.” Wayzata Nissan, *273 LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
David B. Markle v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David B. Markle v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.