Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his…, 889 N.W.2d 340.

28 citing documents.

Jennifer Odegaard v. 610 MOB Partners, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But the nonmoving party must “present specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial”; they cannot rely on “evidence which merely creates a 14 metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue.” (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Jonathan David Fritz v. City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2026
6e; rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased v. Park Nicollet Clinic Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Keith D Hagfors, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Sara E Hagfors v. Fairview Health Services, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Generally, a statute of limitations provides an affirmative defense that is waivable by defendants.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Jared James Sprowls Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“We will only overrule our precedent if provided with a compelling reason to do so.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
[s]tare decisis is not an inflexible rule of law but rather a policy of the law.” (quoting Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., ) (other citation omitted).
Angeleah Joy Brandt v. Garrett James Brandt, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Joan Przybilla, as Trustee, for Next of Kin of Rose Kramer v. Vista Prairie at River Heights, LLC, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Joan Przybilla, as Trustee, for Next of Kin of Rose Kramer v. Vista Prairie at River Heights, LLC, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton, deceased v. TMS Treatment Center, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dennis J. Daulton, trustee for the next of kin of Brady Joel Daulton, deceased v. TMS Treatment Center, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Genevieve M. Rossow Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Freedom Kerkula, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Grace Elizabeth Bettie v. City of Moorhead, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
James L. Lang v. Craig Bjorklund, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Ariola v. City of Stillwater , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Lineth Arrocha, et al v. Como Park Zoo And Conservatory, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
One exception to this general rule is when the claim is barred by “recreational-use immunity.” See Ariola v. City of Stillwater , -54 (Mi nn.
Wade S. Nukala v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Green-Glo Turf Farms, see Ariola v. City of Stillwater , (discussing trespasser exception to recreational- use immunity), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Colleen Cole f/k/a Colleen Wallin v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We will generally “adhere to former decisions in order that there might be stability in the law,” and we “will only overrule our precedent if provided with a compelling reason to do so.” (quotations omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Douglas W. Wenker, et al v. Le Sueur County, Shoreland Recreational Cooperative, d/b/a Shoreland Country Club Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Ariola v. City of Stillwater , -56 (Minn. App. 2017) , review denied (Minn. Apr.
Alla K. Popovich, as wife and Guardian Ad Litem for Aleksandr M. Popovich, et al v. Allina Health … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ariola v. City of Stillwater , (quotations and citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Keenon Lamar Bowlds Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We will only overrule our precedent if provided with a compelling reason to do so.” Ariola v. City of Stillwater , (emphasis 5 added), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Integrity Insurance Company, vs, First Dakota Indemnity Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The reasons for departing from former decisions must greatly outweigh reasons f or adhering to them.” (quotation and citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Ashlee Kay Sames v. Scott County, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Ariola v. City of Stillwater , (explaining that because summary judgment is a “blunt instrument .
Lunda Construction Company v. County of Anoka Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To defeat a motion for summary judgment, the nonmoving party must do more than “merely create[] a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue.” Ariola v. City of 9 Stillwater, (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Luis Alberto Muniz Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ariola v. City of Stillwater , (M inn.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. C. S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ariola v. City of Stillwater , review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jerome M. Kraskey Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. , d 401, 406 (Minn. 2000), and we “only overrule our precedent if provided with a compelling reason to do so.” Ariola v. City of Stillwater , review denied (Minn. Apr.
KLC Financial, Inc. v. Plymouth Harvest Grill, LLC, et al., Aspen Showroom, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In ruling on a summary-judgment motion, “the [district] court may consider all admissible evidence, including witness affidavits.” review denied (Minn. Apr.