DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 913 N.W.2d 687.

65 citing documents.

Mike Baer v. Kelley Luckey F/K/A Kelley Baer, David Baer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., Inc., (“this court must ignore a harmless error.”), aff’d
Life Fitness, LLC v. Anthony S. Dahmen, Bruce Banker Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., (“A contract’s terms are not ambiguous simply because the parties’ interpretations differ.”).
Minnesota Attorney General’s Office v. Schierholz and Associates, Inc., d/b/a Broadmoor Valley, Paul Milton Schierholz Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., Inc., (“[a] jury instruction is prejudicial if a more accurate instruction would have changed the outcome in the case” (quotation omitted)).
Jeffrey H Landon, et al v. JBS Holdings, LLC a/k/a JBS Holding LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Stausi Jeff Duross v. Margaret Stewart Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Hegenes Properties, LLC v. Michelle Rodriguez, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Range Cornice & Roofing Company v. Spectra Building Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Inc., (quotation omitted).
Troy K. Scheffler v. Bob Jacobson, as Commissioner of Minn Dept of Public Safety, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., Inc., aff’d, (quotation omitted).
Michael Fosness, et al v. Jennifer Chmielewski Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Maple Grove NBC, LLC v. Cake Gals Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., Inc., (quotation omitted), aff’d
Zev Oman v. Sharei Chesed Congregation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Reliant Loan Servicing, LLC v. Kimloan Thi Nguyen, PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., Inc., aff’d on other grounds, d 687 (Minn. 2018) .
Robyn Johnson v. Elizabeth Wright, et al., Amit Sela, et al., LiveWell Senior Communities Management, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Larry Walters, et al v. Kyle Stromstad, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Matter of the Trusteeships Under the Trust Indentures between the City of Edwardsville, Kansas and … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Franke E Carpenter, III, et al v. Michael Carpenter, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
OCH Bookstore, LLC v. Just Take Action, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
David Schindele v. Build 218 LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., Inc., (quotation omitted), aff’d
In re the Matter of: Rodney Tristan Miller (Deceased) v. Pamela Marie Spera FKA Pamela Marie Miller, Maria … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Serv., Inc., (“The primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” (quotation omitted)).
James P Gerchy v. Autumn Antlers Trophy Whitetail Lodge, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ann Riley, James Lucius v. Harris Builders, Inc., Mid State Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northtown Mall Territories LLC v. 398 Northtown Drive BLA LLC, dba Cloud Kitchens Minn. Ct. App. 2024
SECURA Insurance Company, as subrogee of Lance Goettl d/b/a TLG Farm Partnership v. Deere & Company, Kibble Equipment … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
SECURA Insurance Company, as subrogee of Lance Goettl d/b/a TLG Farm Partnership v. Deere & Company, Kibble Equipment … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Sandra Weise v. Alan M. Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Sandra Weise v. Alan M. Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, BPC, Inc., Thomas Nelson, vs. Pinnacle … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, BPC, Inc., Thomas Nelson, vs. Pinnacle … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Servs., Inc., (“Ordinarily, [appellate courts do] not consider an issue not decided by the district court.”) 8 “a real estate salesperson [to draw or assist in drawing] papers incident to the sale, trade, lease, or loan of property.” Minn. Stat. § 481.02, subd.
1648 Properties, LLC, et al v. Morrisun Sund, PLLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dr. Wayne R. Freese, et al v. Dr. Reed Leiting, et al., jointly and severally Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., Inc. , , aff’d, (finding multiple prevailing parties); Haugland v. Canton , (finding one prevailing party).
Explained Minn. 2023
Servs., Inc., – 94 (Minn. 2018).
Fitness International, LLC v. City Center Ventures, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jonathan G. Foss v. Mark Scott Savage, Susan Foss, et al., Third Party Defendants Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Shawnae Feltus v. Jeffrey Niemala, et al., and RE/MAX Thousand Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The goal of contract interpretation is “to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Mgmt Servs., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Cheryl Orcutt v. Jon Crews, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Katie Howard, et al v. Sun Trust Financial LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Servs., Inc., aff’d on other grounds, d 687 (Minn. 2018).
Sunlight Senior Living I LLC v. Sunlight Senior Living Inc., et al., Sunlight Services LLC, Peaceful Lodge Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Anne Johanning Probst v. Thomas Raymond Probst Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Servs., Inc., (“If the district court determines that a contract is ambiguous, it may admit parol, or extrinsic, evidence of the parties’ intent.”).
Trygve Svard v. Camelot Nine Encore Association Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Servs., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Criticized Capacity Wireless, LLC v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Servs., Inc., aff’d on other grounds
Kevin S. Carpenter, et al v. City of St. Cloud Minn. Ct. App. 2022
FKS Enterprises, Inc., et al v. Matthew Whebbe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Servs., Inc., –26 (Minn. App. 2017), aff’d on other grounds
Keith D. Bexell, et al v. Jonathan Brand, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Servs., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Tuckborough Farm Homeowners Association, Inc. v. John W. Lang, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Judicial Branch v. Teamsters Local 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Windcliff Association, Inc. v. Aaron Breyfogle, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
North Loop Downtown, LLC v. Benjamin Liao, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Capacity Wireless, LLC v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
S ervs., Inc., aff’d, Capacity also asserts that the university’s questions to Rosenfeld about the Massachusetts lawsuit were more prejudicial than probative because the university asked about what the judge in that case found, which might cause a jury to give undue credit to the judge’s findings.
Minn. 2021
Servs., Inc. , 2 (Minn. 2018).
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Allen Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Servs., Inc., 133 (Minn. App. 2017), aff’d