Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Onyelobi v. State, 932 N.W.2d 272.

29 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
5 Probable cause exists “when there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” Onyelobi v. State , (quotation omitted).
Sean William Roulo, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But “claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal are not barred by the Knaffla rule in a first postconviction appeal because they could not have been brought at any earlier time.” (emphasis omitted) (quotation omitted).
Douglas Allan Treu, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Nantambu Noah Kambon, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Nantambu Noah Kambon, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Milton K. Sanders, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Milton K. Sanders, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
n.2 (Minn. 2013); n.2 (Minn. 2018); n.3 (Minn. 2019).
Carlos Heard, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Carlos Heard, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
n.3 (Minn. 2019); n.2 (Minn. 2018); n.2 (Minn. 2013).
Leroy Roderick Paul, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Leroy Roderick Paul, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” Onyelobi v. State , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Probable cause exists when 9 there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).
A23-0588 Minn. 2024
A warrant is supported by probable cause if, considering the totality of the circumstances, there is a “ ‘fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.’ ” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S .
State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Probable cause exists when there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).
Thomas Robert Tichich v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
Thomas Robert Tichich v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
Randy Terrell Mayberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Randy Terrell Mayberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(explaining that “[c]laims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal are not barred by the Knaffla rule in a first postconviction appeal because they could not have been brought at any earlier time” (emphasis omitted) (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
It “exists when there is a ‘fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime 9 will be found in a particular place.’ ” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[T]o determine whether [a defendant’s] counsel was ineffective, [a reviewing court] must look to the merits of [the defendant’s] underlying claims.”
Richard Theodore Knoll, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[T]o determine whether [a defendant’s] appellate counsel was 7 ineffective, [a reviewing court] must look to the merits of [the defendant’s] underlying claims.”
Alexander James Ray, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[T]o determine whether [a defendant’s] appellate counsel was 6 ineffective, [a reviewing court] must look to the merits of [the defendant’s] underlying claims.”
Raymond Joseph Traylor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Charles Earl Strother, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Unlike ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claims , ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claims “are not barred by the Knaffla rule[1] in a first postconviction [petition] because they could not have been brought at any earlier time.”
Minn. 2021
Onyelobi v. State (Onyelobi II), –80 (Minn. 2019).
Elton James Curtis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Unlike ineffective-assistance-o f-trial-counsel claims, ineffec tive-assistance-of-appellate- counsel claims “are not barred by the Knaffla rule in a first postconviction [petition] because these claims could not have been brought on direct appeal.” Onyelobi v. State
Leonard Goodloe, Minn. 2019