Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.

558 citing documents.

Christopher Villella v. Patrick Villella, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Joseph J. Walters v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This court reviews de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
CSM Bonaventure Limited Partnership, L.L.L.P. v. Fun Eats and Drinks, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Chad Loran Siegel v. Drew Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In doing so, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Groebner and Associates, Inc. v. VW Dig LLC, d/b/a VW Connect, an Arizona limited liablity company Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When reviewing a summary-judgment order, appellate courts determine “de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, et al., Pine … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, et al., Pine … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Travis J Maahs, a Minnesota resident v. Menard, Inc., a foreign corporation, registered in Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Maria Olson, et al v. Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Angie M. Barsness, et al v. Fairview Health Services Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that appellate court s review the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party on an appeal from a grant of summary judgment) .
David Jaworski v. Christina Jaworski, Jacqueline Friesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
David Bissen, et al v. City of Crystal, JUFH Enterprises LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
David Bissen, et al v. City of Crystal, JUFH Enterprises LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Metropolitan Transportation Network, Inc., et al v. Collaborative Student Transportation of Minnesota, LLC, et al 6 N.W.3d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Metropolitan Transportation Network, Inc., et al v. Collaborative Student Transportation of Minnesota, LLC, et al 6 N.W.3d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When reviewing a summary-judgment ruling, “we review [de novo] whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Craig Stevenson, et al v. Sean Stevenson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Calvin D. Boquist v. David Zierman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In doing so, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Pauline Sellner v. Pheasants Forever, Inc., Curtis Plotz, et al., vs. Glen Mathiowetz, et al., Third-Party Defendants Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[Appellate courts] view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Housing First Minnesota v. City of Corcoran (A23-1049). Housing First Minnesota, vs. City of Dayton (A23-1050) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Zosha Winegar-Schultz v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Brian Rhodes, et al v. Stockwell Homes, L.L.C., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Brian Rhodes, et al v. Stockwell Homes, L.L.C., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We therefore “review de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
A Business Solutions Company LLC, d/b/a AFOX Solutions, LLC, a LGBTE Company, et al v. American Business Forms, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Great Northwest Insurance Company v. Hector A. Campbell, Betty L. Campbell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Great Northwest Insurance Company v. Hector A. Campbell, Betty L. Campbell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Maple Ridge Homeowners Association v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (reviewing grant of summary judgment); Frontier Ins.
Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Research Action Council, et al., HOME … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Research Action Council, et al., HOME … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When reviewing a summary-judgment ruling, “we review [de novo] whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chase Rovere, et al v. Clifford Ling, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Trust established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the Wachovia Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Trust established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the Wachovia Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Chase Rovere, et al v. Clifford Ling, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Ana Thompson v. VIP Floral, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Pedro Alonzo, et al v. Richard Menholt, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
As the opinion of the court notes, reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Craig A Reichel, et al v. Wendland Utz, LTD, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P ., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Adam Dowd v. Lynn Slordal, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
As to the materiality of the information Slordal did not disclose, caselaw is clear that “[m]ateriality is ordinarily a question of fact” and is only a legal question when “reasonable minds can reach only one conclusion.” STAR Ctrs, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., , 77 (Minn. 2002).
Ali Alfureedy, et al v. City of Saint Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
South Country Health Alliance, et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al., Medica Health Plans, HMO … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When considering the record on summary judgment, we “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Kristie Kollmann, et al v. Joseph M. Garding, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P ., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Madison Equities, Inc. v. SEIU MN State Council, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Jade Joseph Nickels v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party a gainst whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Teresa M. Hintze, et al v. Karen A. Hoese, et al., Chad Harwood, et al., Dale W. Hoese, … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, LLP, d 72, 76-77 (Minn. 2002).
Clarence Hightower v. Community Action Partnership of Ramsey and Washington Counties Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In doing so, this court “view[s] the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Donald Steele v. Brent LaFavor, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When reviewing a summary-judgment ruling, “we review [de novo] whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Wayne E. Hukriede, et al v. Melanie A. Engh-Liska, aka Melanie A. Liska, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Wells Fargo Bank, N. A v. Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Capital City Properties, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, LLP, -77 (Minn. 2002).
Leonard Zimmer, et al v. Pine Lake Township Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, LLP, - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Carl Green v. USA Towing & Recovery, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).