Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.

555 citing documents.

Chad Loran Siegel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In doing so, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Groebner and Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When reviewing a summary-judgment order, appellate courts determine “de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Travis J Maahs, a Minnesota resident, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
David Jaworski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Angie M. Barsness, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that appellate court s review the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party on an appeal from a grant of summary judgment) .
David Bissen v. City of Crystal, JUFH Enterprises LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
David Bissen v. City of Crystal, JUFH Enterprises LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Metropolitan Transportation Network, Inc. v. Collaborative Student Transportation of Minnesota, ... 6 N.W.3d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Metropolitan Transportation Network, Inc. v. Collaborative Student Transportation of Minnesota, ... 6 N.W.3d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When reviewing a summary-judgment ruling, “we review [de novo] whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Craig Stevenson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Calvin D. Boquist, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In doing so, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Pauline Sellner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[Appellate courts] view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
A23-1050 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Zosha Winegar-Schultz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Brian Rhodes v. Stockwell Homes, L.L.C. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Brian Rhodes v. Stockwell Homes, L.L.C. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We therefore “review de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
A Business Solutions Company LLC, d/b/a AFOX Solutions, LLC, a LGBTE Company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Great Northwest Insurance Company v. Hector A. Campbell, Betty L. Campbell, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Great Northwest Insurance Company v. Hector A. Campbell, Betty L. Campbell, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Maple Ridge Homeowners Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (reviewing grant of summary judgment); Frontier Ins.
Fletcher Properties, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Research Action ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Fletcher Properties, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Research Action ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When reviewing a summary-judgment ruling, “we review [de novo] whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A22-1770 In the Matter of the Trust established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the Wachovia … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A22-1770 In the Matter of the Trust established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the Wachovia … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Ana Thompson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Pedro Alonzo, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
As the opinion of the court notes, reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Craig A Reichel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P ., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Adam Dowd, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
As to the materiality of the information Slordal did not disclose, caselaw is clear that “[m]ateriality is ordinarily a question of fact” and is only a legal question when “reasonable minds can reach only one conclusion.” STAR Ctrs, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., , 77 (Minn. 2002).
Ali Alfureedy, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
South Country Health Alliance, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When considering the record on summary judgment, we “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Kristie Kollmann, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P ., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Madison Equities, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Jade Joseph Nickels, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party a gainst whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Teresa M. Hintze, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, LLP, d 72, 76-77 (Minn. 2002).
Clarence Hightower, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In doing so, this court “view[s] the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Donald Steele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When reviewing a summary-judgment ruling, “we review [de novo] whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Wayne E. Hukriede, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, LLP, -77 (Minn. 2002).
Leonard Zimmer, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, LLP, - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Carl Green, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Western National Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When considering the record on summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
John Joseph Wawersich, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that, on appeal from summary judgment, the appellate court views “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Anthony Novak, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).