Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.

558 citing documents.

Western National Mutual Insurance Company v. Alyssa Marie Donahue, Scott Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When considering the record on summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
John Joseph Wawersich v. 2020 Ford F150, MN Plate FLC249, VIN 1FTFW1E40LKE95724 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that, on appeal from summary judgment, the appellate court views “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Anthony Novak v. Lorie Miller, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Doe 598 v. Special School Dist. No. 6, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Elliott Sirota, et al v. Villas of St. Albans Bay Association Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
In the Matter of the Petition of: Herman M. Bacchus and Chandra D. Bacchus for an Easement by … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that, on appeal from summary judgment, the appellate court views “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Charlotte Copiskey v. IMT Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Peggy R. Ek, Richie Lee Vessel v. Jacquelynn Massengill Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary 4 judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Jonathan G. Foss v. Mark Scott Savage, Susan Foss, et al., Third Party Defendants Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In so doing, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Christopher Abdul-Haqq, et al v. David LaLiberte, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
North Star Mutual Insurance Company v. Christopher Erickson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Lauren Peterson v. City of Minneapolis, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
Brenda Lutzke v. Metropolitan Council, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Sunlight Senior Living I LLC v. Sunlight Senior Living Inc., et al., Sunlight Services LLC, Peaceful Lodge Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
This court reviews both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Landform Professional Services, LLC v. Kevin Lefebvre, et al., The Bank of Elk River, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre 7 & Benson, L.L.P.
Tony Jacobson v. AOM Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In determining whether the record creates a genuine issue of material fact, appellate courts must “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L .L.P., -77 (Minn. a 10% dividend on this $3 million investment if AOM was in compliance with its debt covenants” when “it knew that it would never be in compliance with its debt covenants.” Consistent with Jacobson’s framing of his case, our focus is on his c
Byron Johnson v. Kaija Freborg Minn. Ct. App. 2022
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Progressive Insurance v. Justin Abel, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In considering the record on summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Brandow Properties, LLC v. Katherine M. Melander, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bryan Leslie Franklin v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2022
On appeal from summary judgment, appellate courts “review de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists,” and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., (citations omitted).
Shanon Renee Harper, DNP, NP v. Dr. Jennifer Tessmer-Tuck, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We review both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
In the Matter of the Application of Timothy D. Moratzka, Trustee of the Nancy L. Mayen Residual Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2022
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
City of Shorewood v. Guy Gerald Sanschagrin, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We review both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Landmark Community Bank, N.A., now doing business as Flagship Bank Minnesota v. James L. Lang Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Damon Doss v. St. Paul Area Electrical JATC Registered Apprenticeship Program Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison v. Howard W. Mostad Minn. Ct. App. 2022
An appellate court views “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Mark D. Island, et al v. Jason D. Ferguson, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Co. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
In re the Estate of: Richard W. Koberoski, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Jesse Smith v. City of Crosby, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Detailed by Design LLC v. Linda Langer, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
All, Inc. v. Christopher Hagen, Fair & Square Remodeling LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Croix Holdings, LLC v. City of Newport Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Myth Live II, Inc. v. City of Maplewood Minn. Ct. App. 2021
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Kawaljit S. Bhatia, as Trustee for the next of kin of Ena M. Bhatia, deceased v. Owners Insurance … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Old Republic Surety Company v. Weinerman and Associates LLC, Mark Bugni, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
This court reviews both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Howard Norsetter v. Minnesota Twins, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kevin Kopka, et al., individually and as parents and natural guardians of minor children B. Kopka and I. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
LeAnn Wilbourn v. Creative Homes, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Bella Vista Condominium Association, et al v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Minnesota Bank & Trust v. 11 Water LLC, et al., David Jon Monson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
William M. Ross v. Dianne’s Custom Candles, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Whitefish Enterprises, LLC v. Dan Leagjeld, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Roger Saba v. Roger Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Evidence is viewed in “the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Paul Boyum v. Federal National Mortgage Association "Fannie Mae", et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
W e “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Capacity Wireless, LLC v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El v. Jeff Titus, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Kathleen Corte v. Matthew Jon Larson, Kylie Rodgers Special Needs Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Lineth Arrocha, et al v. Como Park Zoo And Conservatory, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Travis Colsen v. Bright Birch, Inc. d/b/a Bright Birch Real Estate and d/b/a Bright Birch, a Minnesota corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76 (Minn. 2002).
Gillespie Law Offices, LLP v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Woodlands Chiropractic, P.A., Third-Party Defendant Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by