Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.

555 citing documents.

Doe 598, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Elliott Sirota, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Charlotte Copiskey, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
In the Matter of the Petition of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (stating that, on appeal from summary judgment, the appellate court views “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted”).
Peggy R. Ek, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary 4 judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Jonathan G. Foss, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In so doing, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Christopher Abdul-Haqq, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Lauren Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
Brenda Lutzke, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Sunlight Senior Living I LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
This court reviews both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Landform Professional Services, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre 7 & Benson, L.L.P.
Tony Jacobson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In determining whether the record creates a genuine issue of material fact, appellate courts must “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L .L.P., -77 (Minn. a 10% dividend on this $3 million investment if AOM was in compliance with its debt covenants” when “it knew that it would never be in compliance with its debt covenants.” Consistent with Jacobson’s framing of his case, our focus is on his c
Byron Johnson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Progressive Insurance, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In considering the record on summary judgment, appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Brandow Properties, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bryan Leslie Franklin, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
On appeal from summary judgment, appellate courts “review de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists,” and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., (citations omitted).
Shanon Renee Harper, DNP, NP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We review both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
A21-0832 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
City of Shorewood, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We review both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Landmark Community Bank, N.A., now doing business as Flagship Bank Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Damon Doss, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
An appellate court views “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Mark D. Island, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
In re the Estate of: Richard W. Koberoski, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Jesse Smith, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Detailed by Design LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
All, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Croix Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Myth Live II, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Kawaljit S. Bhatia, as Trustee for the next of kin of Ena M. Bhatia, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Reviewing courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Old Republic Surety Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
This court reviews both questions de novo, viewing “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Howard Norsetter, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kevin Kopka, et al., individually and as parents and natural guardians of minor children B. Kopka and I. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
LeAnn Wilbourn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Bella Vista Condominium Association, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Minnesota Bank & Trust, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
William M. Ross, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Whitefish Enterprises, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Roger Saba, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Evidence is viewed in “the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Paul Boyum, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
W e “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Capacity Wireless, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i Amen El, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Kathleen Corte, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Lineth Arrocha, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Travis Colsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76 (Minn. 2002).
Gillespie Law Offices, LLP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Wade S. Nukala, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76 (Minn. 2002).
Independent School District No. 477, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Debra Sakrison, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.