Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.

555 citing documents.

Oluf Johnson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Producers Livestock Credit Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N On appeal from summary judgment , appellate courts review de no vo “whether a genuine issue of material fact exists” and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Rodney Wayne Kesanen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Assata Kenneh, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Lunda Construction Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“On appeal from summary judgment, we review whether there are a ny genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Tad Ware & Company, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Thomas A. Ruether, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Peter G. Noe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The evidence is viewed “in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Bridgette A. Allan, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., –77 (Minn. 2002).
Sonja Jeanne Timmons, individually, and as mother and natural guardian of Jadyn Bentlie Haugen, Kaily Marie Timmons and … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
In the Matter of the John P. Weitzel and Mary M. Weitzel 2007 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Terese M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Mark Osland, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Chester Vernon Jones, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Patrick Dean, Joan Hunziker-Dean, individually and as derivative representatives of the Center Plaza Association of Rochester, Inc., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Production Stamping, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. Olean 916 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. Olean 916 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A17-1320 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Shane Reasner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Bremer Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Matejcek 916 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bremer Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Matejcek 916 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sumi Mukherjee, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Nancy Bach, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Bremer Bank, N.A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Walsh v. U.S. Bank , N.A ., (motion to dismiss); STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., (summary judgment).
George Lanoue, et al., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Krenske Construction, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Misty Jensen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002) (noting that we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted).
Heather Fitzgerald, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Olson v. JT6HF10u6X0079461 910 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Olson v. JT6HF10u6X0079461 910 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
76-77 (Minn. 2002) ("We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.").
Higher Dimension Materials, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, LLP
Ann Marie Hall, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., - 77 (Minn. 2002).
Midland Funding LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Scott J. Zimmer, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Allan H. Zuehlsdorf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A17-0997 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-77 (Minn. 2002) (citations omitted).
Galyna Anderson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellate courts “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., – 77 (Minn. 2002).
County of Anoka, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
STAR Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., d 72, 76 (Minn. 2002).
Gust G. Johanson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The Tap House Restaurant Group, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In doing so, “we review whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., (citations omitted).
American Express Bank, FSB, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Regents of the University of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
EverStar, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
U. S. Bank National Association, successor by merger to U. S. Bank National Association ND, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
Harstad v. City of Woodbury 902 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Harstad v. City of Woodbury 902 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Carmen A. Dulhanty, on her own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated, Appellant, Fintegra Holdings, LLC, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
6 Faegre & Benson, L .L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).
Brian Pettey, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court reviews de novo “whether there are any genuine issues of mat erial fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn. 2002).