Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Haggerty, 448 N.W.2d 363.

240 citing documents.

Christopher Thigpen v. Best Home Care LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ... Minn. 2025
Christopher Thigpen v. Best Home Care LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ... Minn. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Elakie Fale Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Elakie Fale Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Minnesota statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and a court’s power to declare a statute unconstitutional “should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
onstitutional right to carry a handgun for self- defense, and therefore “his admitted conduct did not constitute a criminal offense.” 12 “Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and [a court’s] power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We presume Minnesota statutes to be constitutional and the “power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota, by Jan Malcolm, Commissioner of Health, in her Official capacity, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“Minnesota statut es are presumed to be constitutional, and the power to declare a st atute unconstitutional is “exercised with extreme caution and only wh en absolutely necessary.” ).
Jodi D. Campbell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Further, “[t]he party challenging a statute has the burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt a violati on of some provision of th e Minnesota Constitution.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and [a court ’s] power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Minnesota statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thibodeaux v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thibodeaux v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Haggerty , , 364 (Minn. 1989).
Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Boutin v. LaFleur , , 714 (Minn. 1999) (citing In re Haggerty , , 364 (Minn. 1989) ).
A17-0708 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only wh en absolutely necessary.”
, A17-0220, A17-0222 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellate courts exercise their power to declare statutes unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
A16-2034 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and [a court’s] power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.” In re Haggerty
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
The “power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota v. David William Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. David William Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Emile Rey 890 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Emile Rey 890 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be 4 exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota v. Donald Joseph Hall, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Donald Joseph Hall, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota v. Brian George Fitch 884 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brian George Fitch 884 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2016
“Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional, and our power to declare a statute unconstitutional should be exercised with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We presume that Minnesota statutes are constitutional and we exercise our authority to declare a statute unconstitutional with “extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We exercise our power to declare a statute unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
Schuette v. City of Hutchinson 843 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2014
Schuette v. City of Hutchinson 843 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2014
cWe presume statutes to be constitutional and exercise the power to declare a statute unconstitutional ‘with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.’ ” ILHC of Eagan, d at 421 ().
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
Minnesota statutes are presumed constitutional and we exercise our authority to declare a statute unconstitutional with “extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
State v. Ness 834 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2013
State v. Ness 834 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2013
We exercise our power to declare laws unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
McCaughtry v. City of Red Wing 831 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2013
McCaughtry v. City of Red Wing 831 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2013
We exercise our power to declare laws unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
Schowalter v. State 822 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 2012
Schowalter v. State 822 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 2012
We exercise our power to declare a statute unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”
78th Street OwnerCo, LLC v. County of Hennepin 813 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 2012
78th Street OwnerCo, LLC v. County of Hennepin 813 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 2012
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
We exercise the power to declare a statute unconstitutional “with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary.”