Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Irwin, 529 N.W.2d 366.

48 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony James Moore. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); WL 612320, at *5-6 (Minn. App. Feb.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gustry Lashawn Sailee AKA Gustry Leshan Sailee. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(explaining that commitment proceedings are civil in nature and that the Confrontation Clause applies only in criminal cases), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: David Wayne Hamilton. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Tyler James Michael Tillman. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, (noting that commitment proceedings are civil in nature and that the Confrontation Clause applies only in criminal cases), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In Re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
8 (deeming inadequately briefed issue to be forfeited); (holding that where appellant fails to specifically identify exhibits to which he objects, inadequate brief results in forfeiture of issue), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Loyd Ivey Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Loyd Ivey Minn. Ct. App. 2026
at 669; (stating that patient has right to counsel under Minn. Stat. § 253B.03, subd.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett Urbanek Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett Urbanek Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This court affirmed the CAP’s decision, concluding that (1) based on our prior decisions— rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995), and In re Civ.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Allan aka Peter Allan George Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Peter Allan aka Peter Allan George Minn. Ct. App. 2025
We rejected both arguments, concluding that (1) based on our prior decisions—d 366, 371 (Minn. App. 1995), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995), and In re Civ.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael Benson Minn. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael Benson Minn. 2024
Benson, 2023 WL 3807476, at *3 (following ).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ingram Oyugi Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ingram Oyugi Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael Benson. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Aaron Wayne White, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
30, 1995); rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); Bieganowski, d at 529-30.
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Malcolm Renfro. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-75 (Minn. App. 1995) (affirming appellant’s civil commitment as an SPP and as mentally ill and dangerous despite a lack of harmful criminal acts while appellant was imprisoned), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Colten Chase Camacho. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
30, 1995); rev. denied (Minn. 3 Camacho also argues that the definitions of SDP and SPP are mutually exclusive because an SPP must have an “utter lack of power to control the person’s sexual impulses,” whereas an SDP need not have “an inability to control the person’s sexual impulses.” Compare Mi
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
30, 1995); rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Richard Allen Smuda. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Pirkl, d at 907-08; rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); d 525, 529-30 (Minn. App. 1994), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Mark Steven Wallace. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995) .
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Christopher Scott Malz. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
30, 1995); In re Irwin , d 366, 375 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); -30 (Minn. App. 1994), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Alan Joseph Schiller. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
30, 1995); -76 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); -30 (Minn. App. 1994), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Claire Lee, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(waiving issue when it was n ot 9 supported by citation to legal authority); (issues deemed waived because they were not adequately argued or briefed), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jose Garcia Arellano Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See In re Irwin , review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995) .
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
30, 1995); review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); -30 (Minn. App. 1994), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
30, 1995); review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); –30 (Minn. App. 1994), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Stephen Danforth, a/k/a Stephen Rabideau. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Stephen Danforth, a/k/a Stephen Rabideau. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Each protection that Danforth claims is required by Specht has later been held to not be required at civil commitment proceedings: the Confrontation Clause does not apply, proof beyond a reasonable doubt is not required, Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 430–31, 99 S. Ct. 1804, 1811– 12 (1979), and there is no privilege against self-incrimination, Allen v. Illinois, 478 U.S. 364, 374, 106 S. Ct. 2988, 2994–95 (1986).
In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem 742 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2007
In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem 742 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2007
(finding that appellant’s failure to attend commitment hearings, which were scheduled within the deadline, resulted in a waiver because “[i]t would be an unreasonable result to permit a proposed patient to *431 avoid commitment simply by not appearing in court.”); (noting that “[a] patient may waive [the] requirements” of section 253B.08), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); (finding waiver of the section 253B.08, subdivision 1 deadlines), aff'd
In Re Civil Commitment of Williams 735 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Civil Commitment of Williams 735 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
17, 2002); (stating that conduct need not be recent), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
EOP-Nicollet Mall, L.L.C. v. County of Hennepin 723 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 2006
EOP-Nicollet Mall, L.L.C. v. County of Hennepin 723 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 2006
rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1995) (finding argument waived where appellant failed to specifically identify evidence to which he objected in brief).
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In re Irwin, *838 review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
Thompson v. First State Bank of Fertile 709 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Thompson v. First State Bank of Fertile 709 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(issue not adequately argued or briefed on appeal deemed waived), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995); Midway Ctr.
Irwin v. Goodno 686 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Irwin v. Goodno 686 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. May 16,1995)..
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).
County of Dakota (CP 46-06) v. Lakeville 559 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
County of Dakota (CP 46-06) v. Lakeville 559 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See City of Cloquet v. Cloquet Sand & Gravel, Inc., 312 Minn. 277 , 279 n. 1, , 644 n. 1 (1977) (supreme court would not consider issue when party provided only minimal explanation of contention on appeal and cited no supporting authority); (issue not adequately argued or briefed on appeal deemed waived), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1995).