Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite American Tower, L.P. v. City of Grant, 636 N.W.2d 309.

229 citing documents.

Lake West Development LLC v. City of Wayzata Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, Anytime Restoration, Seven Acquisition LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, Anytime Restoration, Seven Acquisition LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2026
ROA Rochester, LLC v. City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, vs David P Williams, doing business as Bear Track Outfitting … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, vs David P Williams, doing business as Bear Track Outfitting … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Daley Farm of Lewiston, L.L.P., et al v. County of Winona, Land Stewardship Project, Defenders of Drinking Water Minn. Ct. App. 2024
William Christopher Edrington v. Julianna Lynn Sheridan, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Mahmood Khan v. City of Minneapolis, Hennepin County Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. City of Grant, (stating that, if legislature’s intent is clearly discernible 6 Minneapolis ordinance likewise provides that a property owner “may appeal the assessment to the district court within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment.” MCO § 227.100(d).
State of Minnesota v. John Ishmael Bradley, III Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. John Ishmael Bradley, III Minn. 2024
Tenisha Williams v. Halimatou Diallo Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Tenisha Williams v. Halimatou Diallo Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Sandee Goldsmith Becker, n/k/a Sandee Scroggs Goldsmith v. Leon L. Becker Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Sandee Goldsmith Becker, n/k/a Sandee Scroggs Goldsmith v. Leon L. Becker Minn. Ct. App. 2023
14 Cherrywood, LLC v. City of North Oaks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. City of Grant, (affirming mandamus after the city had not only failed to act on the applicant’s request but also took additional official action “and denied the application”), aff’d as modified, Demolition Landfill Servs., (reversing district court’s dismissal of mandamus petition after city passed resolution denying special use permit following automatic approval of permit application), rev. denied (Minn. July 25, 2000), overruled by J
Kelly Bell, et al v. St. Joseph Mutual Insurance Company, Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. City of Grant, (articulating the procedure for interpreting a statute).
In the Matter of: Del Zotto Products Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. 2022
In the Matter of the Administrative Penalty Order and License Suspension Issued to Kevin McCulloch and Mission Tavern, … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison v. Howard W. Mostad Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. City of Grant, (describing statutory interpretation principles).
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. The City of Minneapolis, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. City of Grant, (“Where the legislature’s intent is clearly discernable from plain and unambiguous language, statutory construction is neither necessary nor permitted and courts apply the statute’s plain meaning.”).
In the Appeal of Jared Cunningham re: DHS Appeal for Maltreatment of a Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Eligibility of Ted Johnson for MSRS General Employees Retirement Plan Coverage Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jessica Hagen, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Minn. 2021
Minn. 2021
v. City of Grant, 10 Section 103D.545, subdivision 3, provides: “In any civil action arising from or related to a rule, order, or stipulation agreement made or a permit issued or denied by the managers under this chapter, the court may award the prevailing party reasonable attorney fees and costs.” 11 Section 10
State of Minnesota v. D. E. L Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Broadway Child Care Center, Inc., et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A19-1701 A19-1702 A19-1703 Minn. 2020
N.H., and Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights-intervenor v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. City of Grant, (“Where the legislature’s intent is clearly discernable from plain and unambigu ous language, statutory construction is neither necessary nor permitted, and courts apply the statute’s plain meaning.”).
Stacey Marable v. City of Minneapolis, Noah Schuchman, et al., Minneapolis Public Housing Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Application of J.M.M. Minn. 2020
In re the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2019
In Re the Custody of: N.S.V., L.J.V., E.T.V., Terri Ann Bischoff v. Linda J. Vetter Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Cole A. Schneider, et al. Below, Richard A. Kelly, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of: Victoria Carlson and Stephen Carlson v. Pam Wheelock, in her official capacity as … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Peterson v. W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. 930 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Peterson v. W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. 930 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. City of Grant , , 312 (Minn. 2001).
State v. Defatte 928 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 2019
State v. Defatte 928 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 2019
v. City of Grant , , 312 (Minn. 2001) ).
State v. Overweg 922 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 2019
State v. Overweg 922 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 2019
v. City of Grant , , 312 (Minn. 2001) ).
Butler v. City of Saint Paul 923 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Butler v. City of Saint Paul 923 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. City of Grant , , 312 (Minn. 2001) ("Where the legislature's intent is clearly discernible from plain and unambiguous language, statutory construction is neither necessary nor permitted and courts apply the statute's plain meaning.").
Firefighters Union Local 4725 v. City of Brainerd 920 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Firefighters Union Local 4725 v. City of Brainerd 920 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. City of Grant , , 312 (Minn. 2001) (providing that "[w]here the legislature's intent is clearly discernible from plain and unambiguous language, statutory construction is neither necessary nor permitted and courts apply the statute's plain meaning").
In re C. S. N. 917 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re C. S. N. 917 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. City of Grant , , 312 (Minn. 2001).
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018