Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker, 664 N.W.2d 848.

32 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: William T. Bienemann, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Gottsacker v. Gottsacker , d 848, 854 (Minn. 2003); Swick v. Swick , rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1991) .
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Leigh Brinkman, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Donald William McIsaac, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Generally, we “exercise independent review” over a district court’s classification of property as marital or nonmarital, although “deference is given to the district court’s findings of fact.” Gottsacker v. Gottsacker , ().
In re the Marriage of: Jesse A. Freking, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Christine Diane Eyal, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The district court has broad disc retion when dividing ma rital property in a dissolution action and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee D'Costa v. Joseph Francis D'Costa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee D'Costa v. Joseph Francis D'Costa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The district court has broad discretion when dividing marital property in a dissolution action and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Kristin Anne Schmidt v. Jonathan William Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kristin Anne Schmidt v. Jonathan William Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
is an issue over which [appellate courts] exercise independent review, though deference is given to the district court’s findings of fact.”
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“If the interest is ‘income’ from the nonmarital asset, it is marital income.”); (stating that cash distributions received during a marriage are typically “considered a return on the investment or income and, therefore .
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Hormann 805 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Hormann 805 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Savig v. First Nat’l Bank of Omaha, (statutory interpretation); (marital property).
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
II This court reviews the district court’s property division for abuse of discretion and will reverse only for an abuse of that discretion
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 753 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 2008
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 753 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 2008
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Co., 256 Minn. 1, 4 , (noting that the court of appeals has consistently held that a post-trial motion based on a theory of recovery not raised at trial is properly denied, but analyzing the merits of the claim anyway).
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(concluding that the interest that a nonmarital certificate of deposit earned during parties’ marriage was income that should be divided as a marital asset upon dissolution), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1991); (“Cash dividends ...

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by