Cited by

In re Welfare of U.S. , .

Thus, given the district court’s “considerable discretion in determining whether a juvenile should be certified for adult prosecution,” (quotation omitted), a remand is appropriate to allow the district court to make findings consistent with the correct legal standards in the first instance.

And “[i]nsufficient time for rehabilitation under the juvenile system is an appropriate consideration when deciding whether to refer the juvenile to adult court.”

In analyzing public-safety factors five and six, we have explained that “insufficient time for rehabilitation under the juvenile system is an appropriate consideration when deciding whether to refer the juvenile to adult court.”

“For purposes of certification, the juvenile is presumed guilty of the alleged offenses.” In re Welfare of U.S.

4; In re Welfare of U.S.

“For purposes of certification, the juvenile is presumed guilty of the alleged offense s.”

In re Welfare of U.S. , d 192, 195 (Minn. App. 2000).

d 192, 196 (Minn. App. 2000).

(including “significant” prior juvenile record of nine misdemeanors, two involving firearms, and two felonies).

Relying on the state argues that rejecting programming by failing to complete the program and reoffending indicates that respondent is not willing to submit to programming in a meaningful way.