Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In RE MARRIAGE OF FITZGERALD v. Fitzgerald, 629 N.W.2d 115.

184 citing documents.

Katherine A. Gruett, Gary L. Gruett v. Victoria B. Labriola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Katherine A. Gruett, Gary L. Gruett v. Victoria B. Labriola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
City of New Hope, pro se parties “are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
In Re the Custody of N.O.K. Jason Michael Krause v. Marissa Lauren Gomez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re the Custody of N.O.K. Jason Michael Krause v. Marissa Lauren Gomez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 115, 119 (Minn. App. 2001).
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Guardianship/Conservatorship of: Lorraine Helen Schmidt. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized 4 that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
In re the Guardianship/Conservatorship of: Lorraine Helen Schmidt. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Under Minnesota caselaw, “pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. E. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. E. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
3 “Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
MicLeonard James Fisherman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
MicLeonard James Fisherman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”).
Rebecca J. Adams, John Crudele v. James Koch, Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, Greg Bohnsack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca J. Adams, John Crudele v. James Koch, Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, Greg Bohnsack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nikita Seras-Nachole Cordes, Relator v. Heartland Midwest, LLC - Burger King, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nikita Seras-Nachole Cordes, Relator v. Heartland Midwest, LLC - Burger King, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert L. Follis, Georgia K. Follis v. State Armory Building Commission Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert L. Follis, Georgia K. Follis v. State Armory Building Commission Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Although courts may make some accommodation to ensure fairness to a pro se party, “this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”
In the matter of the Petition of Melrose Community, LLC for a revision of the legal descriptions reflected … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the matter of the Petition of Melrose Community, LLC for a revision of the legal descriptions reflected … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that “[a]lthough some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules”).
In re the Irrevocable Trust of Kristin N. Kuelbs, Donald C. Hill and Edwardena C. Hill, Trustees In … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Irrevocable Trust of Kristin N. Kuelbs, Donald C. Hill and Edwardena C. Hill, Trustees In … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys.”).
Beardsley v. Garcia 731 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Beardsley v. Garcia 731 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”); (“The right to represent oneself i
Black v. Rimmer 700 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Black v. Rimmer 700 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“Although some accommodations may be made for pro se litigants, this court has repeatedly emphasized that pro se litigants are generally held to the same standard as attorneys and must comply with court rules.”