Cited by

(“Law of the case applies when the appellate court has ruled on a legal issue and remanded for further proceedings on other matters.

of Comm’rs, ; we stated: When determining whether a motion to modify parenting time is a de facto modification to physical custody, and therefore requires an application of the standard to modify custody rather than parenting time, “a court should consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whethe

“Mere continuity of employment, without more, is insufficient to prolong the life of a cause of action for employment discrimination.” (quotation omitted).

App. P. 140.01; (stating that “[t]he law of the case doctrine functions to bar issues that were previously considered and denied in the same case”); (stating that “when the appellate court has ruled on a legal issue .

The issue decided becomes law of the case and may not be relitigated in the trial 10 court or reexamined in a second appeal.” (quotation omitted).

Franklin argued that the predatory-offender registration requirements are a

(“ Law of the case applies when the appellate court has ruled on a legal issue and remanded for further proceedings on other matters.”).

(reviewing the application of the doctrine de novo); Sylvester Bros. Dev.

d 62, 66 (Minn. 1989) (stating that after an appellate court rules on a legal issue and remands for further proceedings on other matters, the issue becomes “law of the case” and may not be reexamined in a second appeal).

See Sigurdson v. Isanti County , (stating that appellate rulings on legal issues may not be reconsidered in a second appeal).

Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. , -67 (Minn. 1989).

See, e.g., Sigurdson v. Isanti County , (reviewing the application of the doctrine de novo); Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London , -21 (Minn. 1987) (same); Sylvester Bros. Dev.

The critical ques tion is “whether any present 4 Although “a federal interpretation of state law is not binding on our court,” McBee v. Team Indus., Inc., n.3 (Minn. 2019), we find the Eighth Circuit’s interpretation to be an accurate reflection of our holdings in Sigurdson v. Isanti County , and Brotherhood of Railway & St eamship Clerks v. State

-67 (Minn. 1989) (citing Lorance v. A T & T Techs., Inc. , 490 U.S. 900, 907, 109 S. Ct. 2261, 2266 (1989), and Del.

(“Law of the case applies when [an] appellate court has ruled on a legal issue and remanded for further proceedings on other matters.

See Sigurdson v. Isanti Cty ., (“Law of the case applies when the appellate court has ruled on a legal issue and remanded for further proceedings on other matters.

Sigurdson v. Isanti County , , 66 (Minn. 1989).

The issue decided becomes ‘law of the case’ and may not be relitigated in the [district] court or reexamined in a second app eal.”

But a statute of limitations may be tolled if the allegedly wrongful conduct was part of “a continuing violation.” Sigurdson v. Isanti County

Some causes of action do not expire under the statute of limitations if the allegedly wrongful act by the defendant was “a continuing violation.”

& S. S. Clerks v. State by Balfour, 303 Minn. 178, to argue that the university’s alleged discriminatory actions continued up until her discharge.

The issue decided becomes ‘law of the case’ and may not be relitigated in the [district] court or reexamined in a second appeal.” (-20 (Minn. 1987)).

Nat’l Bank, review denied (Minn. July 13, 1990); see, -68 (Minn. 1989) (recognizing the doctrine in a discrimination claim).

(“Law of the case applies when the appellate court has ruled on a legal issue and remanded for further proceedings on other matters.

Because the issue was not presented below, Rnauff is barred from raising the issue on appeal, see Thiele v. Stick, 425, N.W.2d 580, 582 (Minn.1988), or on remand

Because the issue was not presented below, Knauff is barred from raising the issue on appeal, or on remand