Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., 499 N.W.2d 842.

39 citing documents.

Marjorie Schroeder, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 542, 546 (Minn. 1949); see also Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that on appeal, the appellant has the burden to show error and prejudice), rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In the Matter of: Nicole Weber and OBO Minor Child v. Jesse Weber Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of: Nicole Weber and OBO Minor Child v. Jesse Weber Minn. Ct. App. 2026
see also Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., 2 In her main brief, and more extensively in her reply brief, wife references husband’s petition for an HRO, and the parties’ dissolution proceedings and parenting-time arrangement.
Willis Jonathon David Carmack, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating appellant has the burden to show error and prejudice), rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In the Matter of the Arthur F. Symens Revocable Trust created September 21, 2016 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Arthur F. Symens Revocable Trust created September 21, 2016 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., d 842, 845 (Minn. App. 1993) (stating that the appellant bears the burden of showing that an error was prejudicial), rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In Re the Custody of: A.L., Ian Larsen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993); see also Minn. R. Civ.
A24-0991 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that, on appeal, the appellant has the burden to show error and prejudice), rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., ( stating that on appeal, the appellant has the burden to show error and prejudice), rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Megan Guetzkow v. Brian John Irgens Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Megan Guetzkow v. Brian John Irgens Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In the Matter of the Mary Kristen Francis Revocable Trust Agreement. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., re v. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993) ; see also Minn. R. Civ.
Athena 2004, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
P. 61; Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. June 28, 1993) (stating that challenger has burden of showing prejudice under harmless-error doctrine).
Erwin Butler, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
7(d) (permitting reversal when a ULJ’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence); Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., d 842, 845 (Minn. App. 1993) (stating that the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. Jun.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. R. T. and B. M. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bloom v. Hydrotherm , Inc., review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Pakou Lee-Barrios and o/b/o Minor Child, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975); Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Roger Prout Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Roger Prout Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, see Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In the Matter of the Administrative Penalty Order of Fays Homestyle Catering. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Administrative Penalty Order of Fays Homestyle Catering. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, see Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975); see Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
J. T. S. v. S. L. v. B. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
J. T. S. v. S. L. v. B. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (“[A]ppellants have the burden on appeal to demonstrate that the [district] court error caused them prejudice.”), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993); (stating that where the findings
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975) (stating that an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error to prevail on appeal); Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Katie Nesbit v. Antonio Arellano, Emilio Trevino. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Katie Nesbit v. Antonio Arellano, Emilio Trevino. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See id.; Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Johnson v. City of Minneapolis 649 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Johnson v. City of Minneapolis 649 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (noting that an appellant cannot prevail on appeal unless an alleged error is also prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (for reversal, a party must show error and resulting prejudice), review denied (Minn. June 23, 1993).
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 594 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 594 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc.
Petition of Santoro 578 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Petition of Santoro 578 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that appellants have burden on appeal to show error prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).