Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Navarre v. South Washington County Schools, 652 N.W.2d 9.

100 citing documents.

Minnesota Coalition on Government Information, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Schs., n.5 (Minn. 2002) (noting that advisory opinions are no t binding authority but may be used for their persuasive value).
Margaret Zabel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Doris Evanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Schs., (quotations omitted).
Larry Walters, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jacob Becker, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Schs., (quotations omitted).
Hybrid Light Solutions, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Schs., (quotations omitted).
Richard Nichols, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert Webber v. Rod Franks, Responsible Authority Carver County, Health and Human Services, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert Webber v. Rod Franks, Responsible Authority Carver County, Health and Human Services, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chad Monson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Schs., (quotation omitted).
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Barbara Henry, Minn. 2023
Schs., d 9, 32 (Minn. 2002).
Anthony Kelley, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A minor child by his mother and natural guardian, Chelsea Rose, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
County Sch., (quotations omitted).
Ammie Murphy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Jesse Smith, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Schs., (quotation omitted).
A20-1587 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ronald J. Bardine, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Brian Madison, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sch s., 16 (Minn. 2002) (quotation omitted ).
Peg Otte, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
When considering a JMOL motion, a district court “must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and determine whether the verdict is manifestly against the entire evidence.” (
Dr. Kimberly Finch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“Whether employment conditions are in fact intolerable is a quest ion of fact judged by a reasonable -person standard.”), rev’d on other grounds
In re the Billie V. Darkenwald Revocable Trust, dated January 21, 1983, restated February 5, 1999, as amended, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Sch., (quotations omitted) .
Michael Esaw, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Schs., (quotations omitted).
Richard R. Fageroos, Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kevin Scott Karsjens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-30, (Minn. 2002) (quotations omitted) (holding that, in cases involving violation of a statutory right, emotional -distress damages are not recoverable without evidence of verifiable physical injury or severe emotional distress); see also Lickteig v. Alde rson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.
Olimpia Onofre Cedillo, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Schools, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that medical testimony is not required in order to substantiate claims for emotional -distress damages so long as the plaintiffs are able to “prove that emotional injury occurred under circumstances tending to guarantee its genuineness.” (quotation omitted).
, A18-1214, A18-1406 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A18-0742 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sch., ( quotations omitted).
Jason Rhoades, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Wesley E. Wills, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
State v. Scovel 916 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
32 (Minn. 2002) ("[W]e need not decide ...
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Alby v. BNSF Ry. Co. 918 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
21 (Minn. 2002) (quotations omitted).
Manor Warehouse & Delivery, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sch., (holding that district court abused its discretion by submitting loss of reputation claim to jury because respondent and her father’s “ conclusory and unsubstantiated statements ” were “ speculative at best and insufficient to support a claim for loss of reputation”).
Herbert B. Fick, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sch., (quotations omitted).
West McDonald Lake Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 899 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
West McDonald Lake Ass'n v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 899 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sch., (“[W]e need not decide .., issues if they are not dispositive to our decision.”).
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Suncom, LLC v. Robert Feuling d/b/a West Side Liquors of Sartell, LLC, and West Side Liquors of Sartell, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Suncom, LLC v. Robert Feuling d/b/a West Side Liquors of Sartell, LLC, and West Side Liquors of Sartell, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sch., (quotations omitted).
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sch., (holding unsubstantiated statements by plaintiff are legally insufficient to support reputation damages).
Buckingham Trucking, Inc. v. Excel Manufacturing, Inc., and Excel Manufacturing, Inc., Third Party v. JWR, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Buckingham Trucking, Inc. v. Excel Manufacturing, Inc., and Excel Manufacturing, Inc., Third Party v. JWR, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sch., (quotations omitted).
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 883 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2016
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 883 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2016
Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sch., (quotations omitted).
Patrick Exner v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2016