Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jackson, 363 N.W.2d 758.

116 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ronald Dean Davis, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court has also explained that section 609.04 “bars multiple convictions under 13 different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Derrick John Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Similarly, “section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Loren Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court has interpreted section 609.04 to “bar[] multiple convictions under different sections 13 of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Malik Demone Tatum Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court has “consistently held that section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” d 537, 556 (Minn. 2023) (remanding, sua sponte, a duplicative second-degree intentional murder conviction to be vacated when the defendant was also convicted of first-degree felony murder for the same killing); (Minn. 201
State of Minnesota v. Glenn Michael Rhineberger Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The statute “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute 8 for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Alexandra Jean Phillippi Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“[S]ection 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Steven Monson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court has interpreted section 609.04 to “bar[ ] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Allen Halfhill Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court has interpreted this section “to bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Jacquelyn Jeanne Libis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Steven Douglas Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Further, “section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” , 760 (Minn. 1985) .
State of Minnesota v. Jawane Deshawn Bellazan Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Section 609.04 “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1, a criminal defendant “may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both.” Section 609.04 also “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Austin McKepton Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And section 609.04 “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Eugene Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The supreme court has interpreted section 609.04 to prohibit “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute.”
State of Minnesota v. Cody Michael Bauer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
16 A defendant cannot be convicted under “different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” see Minn. Stat. § 609.04, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Jermaine La Johnson, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This statute bars not only multiple convictions for an offense and its included offenses, but also “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson
Gordon William Griebenow v. Commissioner of Public Safety (A23-1649), and State of Minnesota (A24-0006), vs. Gordon William Griebenow Minn. Ct. App. 2024
609.04, subdivision 1 (2022), provides that “[u]pon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both.” The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted this prohibition as precluding “multiple convictions under 14 different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Phillip Charles Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Phillip Charles Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota courts have interpreted Minn. Stat. § 609.04 (2018) to “bar multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Damarcus Deontay Holloway Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Damarcus Deontay Holloway Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This statute bars not only multiple convictions for an offense and its included offenses but also “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Charlene Marie Waldron Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Charlene Marie Waldron Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The supreme court has interpreted this section “to bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Terry Marcell Allen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1, and the section “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson
State of Minnesota v. Michael Paul Kuklok Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The supreme court has held that “section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Carlos Sharice London Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted section 609.04 to “bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Justyn Tyler Hosley Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Section 609.04 also “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Donald Knott Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Section 609.04 “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Manuel Braulio Barrios Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The Minnesota Supreme Court has “consistently held that section 609.04 bars multiple 7 convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome Stephenson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Section 609.04 also “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Levell Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minnesota law precludes “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson, 5
State of Minnesota v. Albert Lomami Okitokoko Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The supreme court has held that “section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Frank Garrett Quentin Walter Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The supreme court has held that “section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. John Steven Stenbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[S]ection 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. L., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted Minn. Stat. 11 § 609.04 to “bar[] multiple convictions under di fferent sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Tony James Hewitt Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Tyreese Eugene Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted Minn. Stat. § 609.04 to “bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson , 7 60 (Minn. 1985).
State of Minnesota v. Adam Lee Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Troy James Bonkowske Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The 9 Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted Minn. Stat. § 609.04 (2018) to “bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson
State of Minnesota v. John Stephen Bense Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The supreme court has interpreted Minn. Stat. § 609.04 (2018) to bar “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” -71 (Minn. App. 1992) (citing State v. Jackson , ).
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Fanpatrick Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Corey Lemond Bingham Minn. Ct. App. 2020
on the basis of the same act or unitary course of conduct.” see also State v. Jackson , (“[W]e have consistently held that section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”) .
State of Minnesota v. Lavelle Darnell Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2020
ngle behavioral incident, which allows multiple convictions but not multiple sentences.”); see also, -34 (Minn. 2014) (pursuant to section 609.035, vacating one of the two imposed sentences for stalking and violating an order for protection because the conduct underlying the offenses arose out of Jackson, (“[S]ection 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua James Dennison Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Danny Lee Harper, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Minnesota Statutes section 609.04 has been interpreted to bar “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. Portia Renee Glover Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Section 609.04 also “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”
State of Minnesota v. DaJuan Wendell Webster Rayford Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The Minneso ta Supreme Court has “consistently held that section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson
State of Minnesota v. Warren Skinaway Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted Minn. Stat. § 609.04 to “bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” 760 (Minn. 1985).
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Davis Fratzke Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 758, 760 (Minn. 1985) (interpreting section 609.04).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Arthur Barron Minn. Ct. App. 2020
This statute “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a si ngle behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson , see also State v. Smith , (noting that Minn. Stat. § 609.04 prevents “convicting a defendant twice for the same offense (or of one offense and a necessarily included offense) on the basis of the same act” (quotation omitted)).