Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Huss, 506 N.W.2d 290.

112 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Huss , -93 (Minn. 1993) (holding that testimony of the alleged victim of child abuse was insufficient to convict because it was not sufficiently credible and the victim had been exposed to highly suggestive material by the state).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re 911 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2018
In re 911 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2018
40 (Minn. 2014) ("[W]e defer to the juvenile court's determination on the credibility and weight to be given [to] witnesses' testimony."); State v. Huss , , 292 (Minn. 1993) ("The weight and credibility of the witnesses is for the trier of fact.").
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Relying on State v. Kemp, 272 Minn. 447, Rose argues that this is a case re quiring corroboration of the single witness’s testimony.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
For example, -93 (Minn. 1993), where the supreme court determined that a three -year-old complainant’s uncorroborated testimony in a sexual -abuse case was insufficient to prove guilt because the child was exposed to “highly suggestive” material and her testimony was inconsistent.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A17-0357 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-93 (Minn. 1993); d 76, 77 (Minn. 1978).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 290, 291-92 (Minn. 1993).
State of Minnesota v. Filbert Okari Onyoni Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Filbert Okari Onyoni Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-93 (Minn. 1993); State v. Gluff, 285 Minn. 148, 151
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Allen Heidemann Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Andrew Allen Heidemann Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Heidemann relies on three cases, and State v. Gluff, 285 Minn. 148, d 63 (1969).
State of Minnesota v. Delonte Ahshone Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Delonte Ahshone Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Paula Mirare Overby Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Paula Mirare Overby Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. George Barnard Crooks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. George Barnard Crooks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Alan Nielsen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Alan Nielsen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Troy Adam Gocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Troy Adam Gocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But, as Gocha argues, “convictions have been reversed where the evidence supporting the conviction was of dubious credibility.” For that proposition, he cites two cases from the Minnesota Supreme Court: –93 (Minn. 1993)
State of Minnesota v. Luis Fernando Escobar-Chilel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Luis Fernando Escobar-Chilel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kelly Bruce Goggleye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kelly Bruce Goggleye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Charles Arthur Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wendell Anthony Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Arthur Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wendell Anthony Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The weight and credibility of the witnesses is for the trier of fact.”
State of Minnesota v. Cory Allen Wuollet Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cory Allen Wuollet Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-93 (Minn. 1993) (noting “unusual facts” and reversing conviction for criminal sexual 5 conduct where child victim’s testimony lacked credibility and victim had been exposed by the state to highly suggestive material); (Minn. 1
State of Minnesota v. Jose Manuel Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jose Manuel Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Karen Sue Butcher Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Karen Sue Butcher Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellant also argues that O.W.’s testimony may have been unduly affected by exposure to C.W.’s journal, which contained evidence of C.W.’s abuse by appellant, 8 –93 (Minn. 1993) (holding that the evidence was insufficient to support a criminal-sexual-conduct conviction when a three-year-old child was exposed to highly suggestive material on sexual abuse, which may have improperly influenced the child’s report of events).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by