Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rewitzer, 617 N.W.2d 407.

52 citing documents.

Christopher Thigpen v. Best Home Care LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ... Minn. 2025
Christopher Thigpen v. Best Home Care LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ... Minn. 2025
we conclude that because the harshness of the punishment is not grossly disproportional to the gravity of Thigpen’s offense, and because the penalty under Minnesota law for unemployment benefit misrepresentation is not an outlier among punishments in Minnesota for similar offenses, or among the
Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue 7 N.W.3d 405 Minn. 2024
Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue 7 N.W.3d 405 Minn. 2024
Jessica Hagen, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Minn. 2021
See, (denying motion to strike where documents that were not part of the appellate record concerned various Minnesota and federal sentencing statistics which were publicly available); (denying the estate’s motion to strike because there is “n
St. Cloud Educational Rights Advocacy Council, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The issue is not whether we may consider the data from public records, but is instead whether the data is properly considered in reviewing the grant of a motion to dismiss, Forslund, d at 32.
Gary Allen Jensen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Safety , see also State v. Rewitzer
Philip Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Michelle L. MacDonald, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew David Feeney. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(denying motion to strike documents that were matters of public record and stating that court was therefore free to refer to them in the course of its own research).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And while this court may consider documents that it could find through its own research, appellant raised this new information in his reply brief rather than his primary brief, and his reply brief must be confined to the new matter raised in respondent’s brief.
In re the Appeal from the Order of the Joint Board of Kandiyohi and Meeker Counties Acting as … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Rewitzer , (refusing to strike documents introduced on appeal rel ating to sentencing statistic s when documents were matters of public record and court was free to refer to them in t h e c o u r s e o f i t s o w n research).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Madden 910 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Madden 910 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court “has broad discretion to impose significantly lower fines if it makes specific findings that immediate payment of the fine would create undue hardship for the convicted person.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The district court has broad discretion to impose significantly lower fines if it makes specific findings that immedi ate payment of the fine would create undue hardship for the convicted person.”
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brent Charles Nielsen. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brent Charles Nielsen. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(denying a motion to strike public records that could be discovered in the course of the court’s own research).
State of Minnesota v. Stevan Andre Wilkins Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stevan Andre Wilkins Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[A] fine is unconstitutionally excessive if it is grossly disproportional to the gravity of the offense.”
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Joseph Traylor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Joseph Traylor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The test of whether a fine is excessive is proportionality: “[A] fine is unconstitutionally excessive if it is grossly disproportional to the gravity of the offense.”
A & M Market LLC v. West Side Groceries, Inc., and third party v. Stryker Market, LLC, third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A & M Market LLC v. West Side Groceries, Inc., and third party v. Stryker Market, LLC, third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Although we may consider publicly available legal materials not presented to the district court, we strike such materials if they are “evidentiary in nature.” Hinneberg v. Big Stone County Hous.
Torgelson v. Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave 734 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Torgelson v. Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave 734 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of D. W. 731 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of D. W. 731 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Robinson 718 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2006
Borgen v. 418 Eglon Avenue 712 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Borgen v. 418 Eglon Avenue 712 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
a legal question that we review de novo.” (citations omitted).
Pederson v. State 692 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2005
Pederson v. State 692 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2005
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek 669 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2003
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek 669 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2003
Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue 656 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2003
Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue 656 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2003
guides our analysis of the principle of proportionality in this case.
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek, GHS-186 VIN: 3G7DA03E41S500032 655 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek, GHS-186 VIN: 3G7DA03E41S500032 655 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Kujak 639 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Kujak 639 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Oberg 627 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Oberg 627 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156 622 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156 622 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2001