Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Desrosier v. Desrosier, 551 N.W.2d 507.

25 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Rachel Naomi Simpson v. Jonathan Edward Simpson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Desrosier v. Desrosier, this court determined that a parent’s annual bonus payments were “a dependable form of periodic payment” under the child-support statute, even though the payments were “not guaranteed and uncertain as to amount.”
In the Marriage of: Todd Charles Sherette v. Melissa Ann Sherette Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 507, 510 (Minn. App. 1996).
In Re the Marriage of: Katherine Patterson v. Jerry Lyn Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Because a [district] court has broa d discretion in dividing property , its [valuation date] decision will stand unless it has abused that discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Any K. Arensberg v. Nicholas Shamus Arensberg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Any K. Arensberg v. Nicholas Shamus Arensberg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[T]he public policy giving children the right to enjoy the benefit of their parents’ increased income is paramount.”
In re the Marriage of: Kelly Susan LaPara v. Timothy Michael LaPara Minn. Ct. App. 2022
As another example, t his court has affirmed in numerous cases that annual bonuses can be periodic payments, even though the bonuses were “not guaranteed and [were] uncertain as to amount,” as long as the record supported the determination that the bonuses were paid more or less on a regular basis.3 d 507, 509 (Minn. App. 1996); see also Novak v. Novak , rev. denied (Minn. July 22, 1987) .
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Lowe Billett v. RuthAnne Billett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Minn. Stat. § 518A.29(a) (2018)
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne v. John Justin Wauzynski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bonuses may be included in an obligor’s income for spousal maintenance purposes when they are regularly received or when they are a dependable form of periodic payment, are expected to continue, and constitute a high percentage of the obligor’s annual inco me. See Derosier v. Derosier
In re the Marriage of: Matthew James Ulness v. Jill Marie Ulness, n/k/a Jill-Marie Stefano Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bonuses may be part of a party’s income, even if th ey are “not guaranteed and uncertain as to amount,” provided that they are “a depe ndable form of periodic payment.”
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda v. Richard Joseph Sinda Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 253, 261 (Minn. App. 1986) (concluding annual bonuses ranging from $0 to $9,000 did not constitute income); Desrosier v. Desrosier , -09 (Minn. App. 1996) (concluding annual bonuses ranging from $7,000 to $17,000 constituted income).
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Winesett v. Heather Winesett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(conclud ing irregular annual bonuses ranging from $0 to $9,000 did not constitute income); -09 (Minn. App. 1996) (concluding annual bonuses ranging from $7,000 to $17,000 constituted income).
In re the Marriage of: Michael Dennis Dewar v. Luanna Sue Gary Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of: Tamara Lynn Kriesel v. Michael James Rossman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-09 (Minn. App. 1996) (concluding annual bonuses ranging from $7,000 to $17,000 constituted income).
In re the Marriage of: Dodamwalage Dinesh Jayawardena v. Mallikaarachchige Sathsarani Jayawardena Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Nelson v. Jeffrey Alan Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Katherina Theresa Bernhagen v. Peter John Bernhagen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Katherina Theresa Bernhagen v. Peter John Bernhagen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(using date of separation as.
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Svenningsen v. Svenningsen 641 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Svenningsen v. Svenningsen 641 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
§ 518.17 to insure support for children during minority); (recognizing public policy favors setting child support at specific amount).