Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Novak v. Novak, 446 N.W.2d 422.

39 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Sarah Lynn Nelson, n/k/a Sarah Lynn Derry v. Abel Aaron Nelson, Ramsey County, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2026
And while a district court must resolve a dispute between joint legal custodians who cannot agree on which school their children should attend, (holding that district courts must resolve disputes between joint legal custodians who cannot agree on educational decisions), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Custody of the Children of: Samuel Thomas Lorang v. Malaree Dawn Perez Minn. Ct. App. 2026
This requirement applies equally to “resolutions of specific issues of custodial care.” rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In Re the Matter of: Nick Emilio Gherardi v. Anna Elizabeth Ayres Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Deandre D’Shaun Adams v. Antoinette York Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Custody of: B. G. F.; Matthew Ryan Foede v. Courtney Ann-Nicole Vaughn, County of Sherburne, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(explaining that “general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issues” are all subject to review of the child’s best interests), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Custody of A. J.-E. L., William Robert Laurie v. Brittany Elizabeth Nebel, County of Wright, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of A. J.-E. L., William Robert Laurie v. Brittany Elizabeth Nebel, County of Wright, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of: A.M.M., DOB 03/05/2017, C.K.M. DOB 08/01/2018: Adam Kent Murdock v. Megan Marie Murdock, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. May 18, 2021); −25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Jeffery Helmin v. Yuemin Xu Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Novak v. Novak , (“The law makes no distinction between general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issues of custodial care.”), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
Joseph Deidrick v. Clarissa Dozier Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Joseph Deidrick v. Clarissa Dozier Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of BJL (DOB 1/8/2018), Nicholas T. White v. Adrianna L Loesch, County of Dakota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Custody of BJL (DOB 1/8/2018), Nicholas T. White v. Adrianna L Loesch, County of Dakota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Valentin Arkadievich Povarchuk v. Rebecca Joyce Povarchuk Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(noting that district court should resolve disagreements between joint legal custodians consistent with the best interests of the child), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
Nathaniel Scott Gustamante v. Emily Louise Schwamberger Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-25 (Minn. App. 1989) (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.17 (1988)), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Erin Renae McKissock n/k/a Erin Renae Kelly v. Brian Todd McKissock Minn. Ct. App. 2023
5(b) (stating that a district court shall modify parenting time when modification “would serve the best interests of the child”); -25 (Minn. App. 1989) (noting that choice of child’s school is a question of legal custody and disagreements should be resolved by considering the best interests of the child), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Ann Kuchera v. Joel Wayne Biebighauser, County of Dakota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Novak v. Novak , rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Custody of: C. W. P.; William James Peck v. Jodie Sue Simonette, and County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
7 The district court rejected mother’s argument in favor of father’s -25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Samuel H. Boimah v. Felitrice Nina Boimah Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“the law makes no distinction between 2 Mother did not file a brief with this court; still, “the case shall be determined on the merits.” Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Joy Krishnan, f/k/a Beuning v. Eric James Beuning Minn. Ct. App. 2021
3(b) (2020); -25 (Minn. App. 1989) (noting that choice of child’s school is a question of legal custody), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Winston Trevor Leak v. Helena Lee Leak Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Ann Reichert v. Matthew Alan Born, County of Dakota, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 437, 443 (Minn. 2018) (noting that “a distri ct court has broad discretion in determining custody and parenting time”); (noting that “the law makes no distinction between general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issu es of custodial care”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Theresa Blair v. Campbell Johnston Blair Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(noting that joint legal custodians’ 13 disagreement regarding schooling of their child should be resolved based on the child’s best interests), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Nieber v. Rebekah Kali Nieber, n/k/a Beka Kali Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Novak v. Novak , review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Brian Eugene Wolf v. Mandy Marie Oestreich Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-24 (Minn. App. 1989) (explaining that joint legal custody award gave parties equal rights to decide type of schooling joint child would receive) , review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Custody of: B. L. F., Cherries Chamberlain v. Neil Fleahman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jo int legal custodians must make such decisions “cooperatively.” Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld , ; -24 (Minn. App. 1989) (noting that joint legal custodians have equal rights and responsibilities regarding their child’s schooling, and that courts decide disputed questions based on the child’s best interests).
In re the Marriage of: Catherine Elizabeth Welch v. William Warrick Welch, III Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Jesse Eugene Schultz v. Christie Jo Ruff Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jesse Eugene Schultz v. Christie Jo Ruff Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-82 (Minn. 2008); (“The law makes no distinction between general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issues of custodial care.”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Brian Hirabayashi v. Chantha Sorn, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Brian Hirabayashi v. Chantha Sorn, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(reversing and remanding for the 3 This appears to be a house with a Rosemount address.
Ramsey County, Laniesha M. Williams v. Nathan D. Washington, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ramsey County, Laniesha M. Williams v. Nathan D. Washington, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Dec.
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-25 (Minn.App.1989) (noting possible discrepancies between the rights granted under Minn. Stat. § 518.176 , subd.