Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Novak v. Novak, 446 N.W.2d 422.

37 citing documents.

In Re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Custody of: B. G. F.; Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(explaining that “general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issues” are all subject to review of the child’s best interests), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Custody of A. J.-E. L., William Robert Laurie v. Brittany Elizabeth Nebel, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of A. J.-E. L., William Robert Laurie v. Brittany Elizabeth Nebel, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. May 18, 2021); −25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Novak v. Novak , (“The law makes no distinction between general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issues of custodial care.”), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
Joseph Deidrick v. Clarissa Dozier Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Joseph Deidrick v. Clarissa Dozier Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Custody of BJL (DOB 1/8/2018), Nicholas T. White v. Adrianna L Loesch, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Custody of BJL (DOB 1/8/2018), Nicholas T. White v. Adrianna L Loesch, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(noting that district court should resolve disagreements between joint legal custodians consistent with the best interests of the child), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
Nathaniel Scott Gustamante, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-25 (Minn. App. 1989) (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.17 (1988)), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
5(b) (stating that a district court shall modify parenting time when modification “would serve the best interests of the child”); -25 (Minn. App. 1989) (noting that choice of child’s school is a question of legal custody and disagreements should be resolved by considering the best interests of the child), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Ann Kuchera, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Novak v. Novak , rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Custody of: C. W. P.; William James Peck, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
7 The district court rejected mother’s argument in favor of father’s -25 (Minn. App. 1989), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Samuel H. Boimah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“the law makes no distinction between 2 Mother did not file a brief with this court; still, “the case shall be determined on the merits.” Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Joy Krishnan, f/k/a Beuning, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
3(b) (2020); -25 (Minn. App. 1989) (noting that choice of child’s school is a question of legal custody), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Winston Trevor Leak, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Helena Lee Leak, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 437, 443 (Minn. 2018) (noting that “a distri ct court has broad discretion in determining custody and parenting time”); (noting that “the law makes no distinction between general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issu es of custodial care”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Theresa Blair, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(noting that joint legal custodians’ 13 disagreement regarding schooling of their child should be resolved based on the child’s best interests), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Nieber, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Novak v. Novak , review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Brian Eugene Wolf, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-24 (Minn. App. 1989) (explaining that joint legal custody award gave parties equal rights to decide type of schooling joint child would receive) , review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Custody of: B. L. F., Cherries Chamberlain, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Jo int legal custodians must make such decisions “cooperatively.” Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld , ; -24 (Minn. App. 1989) (noting that joint legal custodians have equal rights and responsibilities regarding their child’s schooling, and that courts decide disputed questions based on the child’s best interests).
In re the Marriage of: Catherine Elizabeth Welch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Jesse Eugene Schultz v. Christie Jo Ruff Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jesse Eugene Schultz v. Christie Jo Ruff Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-82 (Minn. 2008); (“The law makes no distinction between general determinations of custody and resolution of specific issues of custodial care.”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Matter of: Brian Hirabayashi v. Chantha Sorn, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Brian Hirabayashi v. Chantha Sorn, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(reversing and remanding for the 3 This appears to be a house with a Rosemount address.
Ramsey County, Laniesha M. Williams v. Nathan D. Washington, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ramsey County, Laniesha M. Williams v. Nathan D. Washington, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Dec.
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-25 (Minn.App.1989) (noting possible discrepancies between the rights granted under Minn. Stat. § 518.176 , subd.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by