Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza Hotel, 562 N.W.2d 690.

39 citing documents.

Timothy S. Christenson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 rests within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
John August Krueger, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
rev. denied, (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Don Magnuson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 rests within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” Meyer v. Best W. Seville Plaza Hotel , , rev. denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Kieu Oanh T. Nguyen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 rests within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Mark Krampf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(noting that a district court does not abuse its discretion when it denies a request to amend on the basis that the requesting party “failed to act with due diligence in their attempts to amend”), rev. denied (Minn. June 26, 1997); (Minn. App.
Advantage Financial, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 rests within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” Meyer v. Best W. Seville Plaza Hotel , rev. denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Credo Salon and Spa, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Meyer v. Best W. Seville Plaza Hotel , rev. denied, (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Life Clinic PA, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Thomas A. Ruether, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
” review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
John S. Drewitz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza Hotel , (holding a party must act with due diligence when attempting to amend complaint), review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
City of Vadnais Heights, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 rests within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Hope Amundsen v. Great Glory Auto, Inc., Kehnny Alabi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hope Amundsen v. Great Glory Auto, Inc., Kehnny Alabi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A district court’s decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 “will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
In re: The Frank John Rodriguez Sr. Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re: The Frank John Rodriguez Sr. Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
In re the Estate of: Harold E. Farnes, a/k/a Harold Farnes and Harold Ellwood Farnes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Harold E. Farnes, a/k/a Harold Farnes and Harold Ellwood Farnes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 rests within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” Meyer v. 5 Best W. Seville Plaza Hotel, review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Shannon Fogarty v. Ciao Bella Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Shannon Fogarty v. Ciao Bella Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The decision to vacate judgment under rule 60.02 rests within the district court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of that discretion.” review denied (Minn. June 26,1997).
Jeffrey Hugh Boldon v. Brian Perry Boldon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey Hugh Boldon v. Brian Perry Boldon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellants must act with “due diligence in their attempts to amend.” Meyer v. Best W. 2 Seville Plaza Hotel, review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Hempel v. Creek House Trust 743 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Hempel v. Creek House Trust 743 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 725 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 725 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
review denied (Minn. June 26, 1997).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.C. 656 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.C. 656 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(construing Minn. R. Civ.
Galbreath v. Coleman 596 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Galbreath v. Coleman 596 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. June 26,1997).
In Re the Alleged Labor Law Violation of Chafoulias Management Co. 572 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Alleged Labor Law Violation of Chafoulias Management Co. 572 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(holding that employees may not bring private cause of action under Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act to recover gratuities because act does not include gratuities within definition of wages), review denied.
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Olson v. Moorhead Country Club 568 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
After the district court acted, review denied (Minn. June 26,1997) that Minn. Stat. § 177.33 (1994) did not provide employees a private cause of action for the recovery of unpaid gratuities.