Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Gully v. Gully, 599 N.W.2d 814.

181 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Amanda Jo Briggs v. Kent Stewart Mitchell Briggs Minn. Ct. App. 2020
D E C I S I O N I Appellate courts review a district court ’s award of attorney fees for an abuse of discretion, and we “will rarely reverse” such a decision, review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara v. Nihad Salah Awad Hamed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A lack of specific findings on the statutory factors “is not fatal to an a ward where review of the order ‘ reasonably implies’ that the district court considered the relevant factor s and where the district court ‘was familiar with the history of the case’ and ‘had access to the parties’ financial records.’” Geske, d at 817 (-26 (Minn. 1999)).
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Kent v. Brenton Jackson Kent Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Erin Elisabeth Dancour, n/k/a Erin Elisabeth Meyers v. Elie E. Dancour Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The standard of review for an appellate court examining an award [or denial] of attorney fees is whether the district court abused its discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Sara Lynn Garcia v. Reuben Jesse Garcia Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Beth Marie Delzer v. Randy Edward Delzer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Aaron Di Luong v. Julie Ho Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of: Ronald Joseph Claeson v. Florence Marie Denais Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Shane Foss v. Justine Topel Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Davis v. Davis , Gully v. Gully
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Nelson v. Jeffrey Alan Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of: Bradley Joseph Patraw, and Ramsey County, intervenor v. Alicia Kay Wittmer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning v. Daniel H. Gruenstein Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders v. Joseph James Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” (citing Ed Herman & ).
Nicole A. Nyhus, Hennepin County v. Sokkhan Ka Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas James Davis v. Theresa Anne Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Attorney Fees “The standard of review for an appellate court examining [a ne ed-based] award of attorney fees is whether the district court abused its discretion.” d 814, 825 (Minn. 1999).
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(finding no abuse of discretion where district court “made no separate finding” that one party was able to pay the other party’s attorney fees but the “court reasonably implie[d]” that it believed the party could pay).
In re the Marriage of: Sheree Rosett Curry v. Michael David Levy Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Jessica Stinchfield Giebenhain v. Michael Edwin Giebenhain Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Heidi Marie Owens v. James Allen Owens, State of Minnesota, County of St. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gully v. Gully , , 825 (Minn. 1999).
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Theresa Kleynhans v. Bernardus Andries Kleynhans Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Morgan-Walg, LLC v. Nicollet Island Development Co., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
the court is fa miliar with the history of the case and has access to the parties’ financial information, it may waive the requirements of [r]ule 119.”
In the Matter of: Kari Dale Hickey v. Dirk Anthony Hummel Minn. Ct. App. 2018
ed proceedings and breached a settlement agreement.” Even if rule 119.02 applies to attorney fees awarded as a sanction, the supreme court has stated that rule 119.02 “is not intended to limit the court’s discretion, but is intended to encourage streamlined handling of fee applications and to facilitate filing of appropriate support to permit consideration of this issue.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Kerry J. Olson, a/k/a Kerry Ciardelli-Olson, n/k/a Kerry J. Ciardelli v. Scott Bradley … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki v. David Victor Rucki, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. Erickson 899 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kokosh v. $4657.00 U.S. Currency 898 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kokosh v. $4657.00 U.S. Currency 898 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“Th[e] equitable doctrine [of laches] provides that, when one sits on one’s rights for too long a time, that person’s claim should be estopped from continuing because it would be inequitable to require the defendant to fight the suit.”).
In re the Marriage of: Teresa Marie Nordahl v. Steven Edward Nordahl Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1, is not fatal to an award where review of the order “reasonably implies ” that the district court considered the relevant factors and where the district court “was familiar with the history of the case” and “had access to the parties’ financial records.” Geske, d at 817 (-26 (Minn. 1999)).
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke v. Susan Lynn Webb Leeke n/k/a Susan Lynn Leeke Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Terri Lyn Swart, Kandiyohi County v. Tracy Donald Swart Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hennepin County, Hawa H. Ibrhim v. Hussein Y. Dawid Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hennepin County, Hawa H. Ibrhim v. Hussein Y. Dawid Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer 889 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
but see Minn. Stat. § 518.14 , subd.
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Heidi B. Moon v. Roderick H. Moon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Lynn Rogers v. David Matthew Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Lynn Rogers v. David Matthew Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Heidi B. Moon v. Roderick H. Moon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the context of reviewing a need-based award of attorney fees, “[t]he standard of review for an appellate court examining an award of attorney fees is whether the district court abused its discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kari Wynn Wahlstrom v. Eric David Wahlstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kari Wynn Wahlstrom v. Eric David Wahlstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The standard of review for an appellate court examining an award of attorney fees is whether the district court abused its discretion.”