Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg, 358 N.W.2d 76.

53 citing documents.

In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: David Michael Kedrowski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Camilla Renae Lee, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Hutchenson Owen v. Angela Dawn Owen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Hutchenson Owen v. Angela Dawn Owen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lenzmeier v. Lenzmeier, 304 Minn. 568, 571 , -29 (Minn.App.1984); (holding that, in equity, the district court may apportion all the debt to one party even though the other party receives the benefit of payment).
Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss 493 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss 493 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(apportionment of entire marital debt to husband who had incurred most of it without consulting wife is within the trial court’s discretion).
In re the Marriage of Freeing v. Freeing 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Freking v. Freking 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Freking v. Freking 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dahlberg v. Dahlberg , , 80 (Minn.App.
In re the Marriage of Freeing v. Freeing 479 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Berenberg v. Berenberg 474 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Berenberg v. Berenberg 474 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“It is within a court’s discretion to consider the tax consequences of its actions.” (citation omitted).
Marriage of Rundell v. Rundell 423 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Rundell v. Rundell 423 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(the court did not abuse its discretion by failing to indicate which party *82 may claim minor children for federal and state tax purposes).
Marriage of O'Donnell v. O'Donnell 412 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of O'Donnell v. O'Donnell 412 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Trial court discretion on this issue is based on the principle that courts should be “ ‘guided by equitable consideration in distributing rights and liabilities.’ ” () (emphasis in original).
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(court held disproportionate award of marital debt was equitable based on the parties’ disproportionate financial and professional assets).
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(upholding apportionment of entire marital debt to husband who had incurred most of them without consulting wife).
Maher v. Maher 393 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maher v. Maher 393 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson 390 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
A trial court should be “guided by equitable considerations in distributing rights and liabilities.” ().
Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wibbens v. Wibbens 379 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Wibbens v. Wibbens 379 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tailor-Navsaria v. Tailor-Navsaria 374 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tailor-Navsaria v. Tailor-Navsaria 374 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Otte v. Otte 368 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985