Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mosby, 450 N.W.2d 629.

37 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“Consciousness of guilt is .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, (“inconsistencies are a sign of human fallibility and do not prove testimony is false, especially when the testimony is about a traumatic event”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that inconsistencies in testimony are a sign of human fallibility and do not prove testimony is false, especially when the testimony is about a traumatic event).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State v. Mosby, 7 rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of: Heidi Sue Heller, obo minor children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See State v. Mosby , (quotation omitted) (requiring only “solemn undertaking to tell the truth”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See, (“The testimony from others about K.R.’s demeanor, emotional condition, and change in behavior after the sexual assault also is strong corroborative evidence.”), rev. denied (Minn. June 29, 2004) ; (“Furthermore, N.D.’s upset, emotional state after the assault provides further corroboration.”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that victim’s demeanor aft er sexual assault corroborated her testimony), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Similarly, in State v. Mosby, we relied on Shamp in holding that the evidence was sufficient to prove sexual penetration when the child-victim testified that the defendant “took his hand and stuck it in [her] private,” which she described as her “middle” or the part she uses “to go the bath room.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
8 review denied (Minn. March 16, 1990), are instructive here.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
As we have said, “inconsistencies are a sign of human fallibility and do not prove testimony is false, especially when the testimony is a bout a traumatic event.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[I]nconsistencies are a sign of human fallibility and do not prove testimony is false, especially when the testimony is about a traumatic event.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Cf. State v. Mosby , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Mosby , (sta ting that sexual -assault victim’ s dem eanor after assault occurred corroborated her testimony), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Ira Dell Sholar Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ira Dell Sholar Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The judge, 2 review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Senen Guerrero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Senen Guerrero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that victim’s emotional state after assault provides corroboration), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Affirmation is simply a solemn undertaking to tell the truth; no special verbal formula is required.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Jose Manuel Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jose Manuel Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(victim’s upset, emotional state after the assault provided corroboration for the criminal-sexual-conduct allegation), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that sexual-assault victim’s demeanor after assault corroborated her testimony), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Jackson 741 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Jackson 741 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Wright 679 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Wright 679 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“inconsistencies are a sign of human fallibility and do not prove testimony is false, especially when the testimony is about a traumatic event.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-33 (Minn.App.1990) (holding that evidence defendant attempted to steal a car in which to flee was evidence admissible as part of the proof of the offense, not Spreigl evidence), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See, (“bad acts” evidence incidentally necessary to prove the charged offense is not Spreigl evidence), pet.
State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Gamez 494 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Gamez 494 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(emotional state after sexual assaults provides corroboration), pet.