Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Walker, 584 N.W.2d 763.

34 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Henry v. United States , 361 U.S. 98, 103 (1959) (stating a defendant ’s “arrest is not justified by what the subsequent search discloses”); (“The legality of the arrest is determined based on the information the police took into consideration when making the arrest, not what was uncovered thereafter.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. A. Y., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Although we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error, see Ortega, d at 149, we independently review those 7 facts to determine reasonableness under the totality of the circumstances
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Henry v. United States, 361 U.S. 98, 103, 80 S. Ct. 168, 171 (1959) (stating a defendant’s “arrest is not justified by what the subsequent search discloses”); (“The legality of the arrest is determined based on the information the police took into consideration when making the arrest, not what was uncovered thereafter.”).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
provided they have probable cause.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See, (“Police officers may arrest a felony suspect without an arrest warrant in any public place, including outside a dwelling, provided they have probable cause.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Marco Allen Coney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marco Allen Coney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph James Ossell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph James Ossell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“If an arrest is valid, police may conduct, without a warrant, a full search of the person of the arrestee as an incident of the arrest without any additional 5 justification.”).
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
One such exception provides that an officer “may arrest a felony suspect without an arrest warrant in any public place, including outside a dwelling, provided they have probable cause.” (citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 96 S. Ct. 820 (1976)).
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Nicole Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Nicole Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
768 (Minn. 1998) (disapproving this 4 The state also asserts that police corroborated information regarding the location of Williams’s home.
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Deshawn Shumpert Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Deshawn Shumpert Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Dickey 827 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Dickey 827 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
provided they have probable cause.” (citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Ortega 749 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Ortega 749 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
To determine if probable cause exists to make a warrantless arrest, a court must look to the “information that police took into consideration when making the arrest, not what they uncovered thereafter.” 2
State v. Olson 634 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Olson 634 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Hawkins 622 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Hawkins 622 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wasson 615 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2000
State v. Wasson 615 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2000
(securing of holding that the warrant may tip scales in case of doubtful probable cause).
State v. Cook 610 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Cook 610 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 2000