Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, 871 N.W.2d 745.

49 citing documents.

American Family Insurance Company a/s/o Nicholas Oelke v. NB Electric, Inc. dba East Side Garage Doors, ... Minn. 2026
In 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, we considered whether the statute of limitations for defective construction claims under the prior version of Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd.
Brenda Thormodson v. Kathryn Rae Zehnder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Brenda Thormodson v. Kathryn Rae Zehnder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jane Doe 271, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Grp., LLC, (“If the meaning of the statute is clear, the plain language of the statute controls.”).
August Ventures, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Grp., LLC, d 745, 751 (Minn. 2015).
Benda for Common-sense, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation v. Denise Anderson, Director of Rice ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Benda for Common-sense, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation v. Denise Anderson, Director of Rice ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. 2023
See 328 Barry Ave., LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC
In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal by Best Care, LLC. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Grp., LLC, DHS’s interpretation matches its promulgated rule stating that “[t]he commissioner shall seek monetary recovery .
Kelly Bell, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A22-0273 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Grp., LLC , see also Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Joseph Roach, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dennis Sershen, Minn. 2022
Grp., LLC, d 745, 750 (Minn. 2015).
In the Matter of the Public Waters Restoration Order Issued to Timothy Maciej. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Grp., LLC, Reissuance of NPDES/SDS Permit, d at 576 (providing that administ rative rules are governed by same rules of construction as statutes).
Fairmont Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Grp., LLC , (applying this principle to the same as in executive order 20-79.
Jennifer Schroeder, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Grp., LLC , (applying statutory-interpretation canon that courts “cannot add words to an unambiguous statute under the guise of statutory interpretation”).
Daniel Ashbach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Debra Sakrison, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Court of A ppeals Chutich, J. St. Paul Park Refining Co. LLC, Respondent, vs. Minn. 2020
A20-0116 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Application of J.M.M. Minn. 2020
Grp., LLC, (“But we cannot add words to an unambiguous statute under the guise of statutory interpretation.” ); Cty.
Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
Grp., LLC , , 751 (Minn. 2015).
In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp. 925 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 2019
In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp. 925 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 2019
Grp., LLC , , 749 (Minn. 2015).
Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLC 924 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLC 924 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Grp., LLC , , 751 (Minn. 2015).
The Echo Newspaper, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To determine whether a st atute is ambiguous, this court interprets the statute “as a whole so as to harmonize and give effect to all its parts.” 328 Barry Ave., LLC v. Nolan Prop s. Grp., LLC, (quotation omitted).
Otto v. Wright Cnty. 910 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 2018
Otto v. Wright Cnty. 910 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 2018
Grp., LLC , , 749 (Minn. 2015).
In re In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp. 910 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp. 910 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Grp., LLC , , 749 (Minn. 2015) (quotation omitted).
The Tap House Restaurant Group, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Grp., LLC, (stating that summary judgment is not proper “when reasonable minds can draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.”).
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
City of Rochester v. Kottschade 896 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2017
City of Rochester v. Kottschade 896 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2017
Grp., LLC, (quoting Jackson v. Mortg.
Grant Park Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Grp., LLC, the association argues that the injury for purposes of this lawsuit is the condensation that occurred at the rim -joist areas, copper bump-outs, and roof parapets, because that injury was a different injury than the condensation caused by the doghouses.
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
Grp., LLC, (quoting Jackson v. Mortg.
Town Center Office Plaza Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Eugene Lee Rushton v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2017
Eugene Lee Rushton v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2017
Grp., LLC, (quoting Jackson v. Mortg.
David B. Markle v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David B. Markle v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Grp., LLC, (stating that appellate court “cannot add words to an unambiguous statute under the 6 guise of statutory interpretation”).
Jason Hoff v. Earl Surman 883 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Hoff v. Earl Surman 883 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Grp., LLC, d 745, 749 (Minn. 2015) (“We interpret a statute as a whole so as to harmonize and give effect to all its parts, and where possible, no word, phrase, or sentence will be held 7 superfluous, void, or insignificant.” (quotation omitted)).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by