| A25-0102 |
Minn. |
2026-05-13 |
Affirmed
|
James Michael Green v. State of Minnesota
|
|
… . Shortly after his arrest, investigators interviewed Green. After waiving his Miranda rights, Green admitted to setting up the drug sale. He also admitted that he had been in the house when Medal- …
|
| A25-0152 |
Minn. |
2026-04-08 |
Affirmed
|
Cedric Lamont Berry v. State of Minnesota
|
|
… aint. The rule requires a district court to inform a defendant of the charges, Miranda rights, the right to communicate with counsel, and the right to a jury trial, and to ensure the defendant has a copy of the complaint. See Minn. R. Cri …
|
| a250764 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2026-03-09 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Guy Willard Blessing
|
|
… ing the defendant of their right to remain silent and have an attorney present. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444, 478-79 (1966). 4 containers specifically Miller High Life beer bottles,” a …
|
| A24-1463 |
Minn. |
2026-02-25 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Deshon Israel Bonnell
|
|
… ents of Bonnell’s cell phone. 6 Miranda rights for the first time. Bonnell requested an attorney, and the officers did not question him further. Bonnell’s mother, however, allowed the officer …
|
| A23-1905 |
Minn. |
2026-02-04 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Jamie Sara Schmeichel
|
|
… n. 1999) (deciding that a suspect was not in custody for purposes of whether a Miranda warning should have been given, even though the district court and the court of appeals bypassed the issue based on the parties’ stipulation that the …
|
| a241100 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2026-01-20 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Louis Burrell
|
|
… a second time. This interview was recorded, but police did not give Burrell a Miranda warning. During this interview, Burrell admitted that the jewelry was T.R.’s and stated that he was protecting the jewelry “so it wouldn’t get stolen. …
|
| a250647 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2025-11-03 |
Affirmed
|
Edward Lee Jones v. State of Minnesota
|
|
… o investigated Jones. The officer testified that he “tried to read [Jones] his Miranda rights” but that Jones “didn’t want to talk to me about everything or give me a fingerprint.” Later the prosecutor asked the detective a question that …
|
| a231760 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2024-09-30 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Edin Gaspar Cruz Flores AKA Marcelino Rivera Rodriguez
|
|
… t court erred by admitting his taped confession to law enforcement because his Miranda waiver was not knowing and intelligent, (2) the district court erred in imposing sentences for multiple counts of first- and second-degree criminal se …
|
| a221579 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2024-04-01 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-Sanchez
|
|
… address associated with Device A, officers arrested him. During a post-Miranda interview, Contreras-Sanchez admitted to participating in a fight with M.M. about 20 days before M.M. died. Contreras-Sanchez initially denied any inv …
|
| a230182 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2024-01-16 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame
|
|
… ifle” and said he would not “go to prison for 60 for the rifle.” During a post-Miranda statement, Warsame acknowledged that he was prohibited from possessing ammunition or firearms due to a prior conviction for a crime of violence. …
|
| A19-0003 |
Minn. |
2019-08-07 |
Affirmed
|
Onyelobi v. State
|
|
… After her arrest, Onyelobi was taken to the police station where she was read a Miranda warning and questioned by police. She admitted to her relationship with Wilson but denied being involved in Fairbanks' death. At some point, the officer …
|
| A17-0518 |
Minn. |
2018-06-13 |
Affirmed
|
Fox v. State
|
|
… of release. 1 On direct appeal, Fox's counsel briefed four arguments: (1) Fox's Miranda rights were violated; (2) his statements to police should have been suppressed; (3) the district court provided an erroneous jury instruction regarding …
|
| A15-1713 |
Minn. |
2017-02-01 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Lilienthal
|
|
… d not commit plain error in admitting evidence of appellant’s post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence during the State’s case-in-chief. 2. Any error by the district court in permitting the State to discuss appellant’s post-arrest, pr …
|
| A16-614 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2017-01-30 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West
|
|
… uing that (1) the district court admitted statements taken in violation of his Miranda rights; (2) the district court admitted involuntary statements; (3) the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to disqualify the p …
|
| A16-443 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2017-01-30 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Chad Thomas Karnowski
|
|
… rehended the officer’s questions and he knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights. 735 N.W.2d at 341-42. The court held that the totality of the evidence demonstrated that the defendant was disabled in communication under Min …
|
| A16-229 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2017-01-30 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Erik John Heinonen
|
|
… uspect consent to provide a DNA sample does not constitute interrogation under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966), and DNA evidence is not testimonial or communicative in nature, a police officer does not violate a s …
|
| A16-574 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2017-01-09 |
Affirmed
|
Denis Alcivar Alvarado-Riera v. State of Minnesota
|
|
… of the phrase was left to future administrative and judicial interpretation.” Miranda-Romero v. Lynch, 797 F.3d 524, 525 (8th Cir. 2015) (quotation omitted). Alvarado-Riera argues that Sanchez, relied on by the district court, is …
|
| A15-1134 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2017-01-09 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Michael Douglas Metsala
|
|
… police found a .380-caliber semiautomatic handgun. After being given a Miranda warning, Metsala made a statement to police, during which he admitted that he possessed the .380-caliber handgun recovered from his business. He also …
|
| A15-1923 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-10-11 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Mark William Latimer
|
|
… overcharging is meritless. Lastly, appellant’s pro se brief presents a Miranda-based argument relating to appellant’s taped statement following the attack. Appellant raised no objection when this …
|
| A15-1336 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-09-06 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Walker
|
|
… d requested to speak with him regarding an assault. Walker agreed and, after a Miranda warning, gave a recorded statement. The state charged Walker with first-degree murder, which was later amended to attempted-first-degree murder. Evide …
|
| A15-1635 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-08-22 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Robert Jamal Poole
|
|
… eved by an officer, Poole was placed in the back seat of a squad car, read his Miranda rights, and interviewed. After running a background check on Poole, the officers discovered that Poole was prohibited from possessing firearms and plac …
|
| A15-1708 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-08-22 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. David Michael Kepner
|
|
… nger had also placed methamphetamine in her vagina. After being advised of her Miranda rights, the passenger admitted that she had concealed methamphetamine in her vagina and turned over approximately 17.6 grams of methamphetamine. The s …
|
| A15-1736 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-07-11 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee Allford
|
|
… he police did not give him 2 a Miranda warning, and that the state had not taken exculpatory evidence into consideration. The state countered that those were not valid reasons for plea withd …
|
| A15-1119 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-07-11 |
Affirmed
|
State of Minnesota v. Malcolm Todey Cooper
|
|
… (1) a statement that he made to a police officer before he was advised of his Miranda rights; and (2) testimony that, two weeks before the drive-by-shooting incident, police stopped appellant and another person in the same car that the …
|