Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. Collins, 238 N.W.2d 608.

80 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The appellant also “has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.” Custom Farm Servs.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: K.A.S. and P.D.Y., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“It is elementary that a party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary to consider the questions presented.” (quotation omitted)); Custom Farm Servs., (“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.”).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.” Custom Farm Servs.
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Custom Farm Servs., (stating that “[b]ecause of the absence of a transcript of the district court proceedings, we cannot consider” several errors that the appellants contend occurred, including “sufficiency of the evidence”).
Valerie Steiner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., see also Custom Farm Servs., (declining to consider an allegation of error in the absence of a transcript).
A24-0939 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal[,]” Custom Farm Services, including any necessary transcripts, Minn. R. Civ.
Jay Maurice, as Trustee for the next-of-kin of Jon Maurice, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joseph Harvey Bellanger. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins , (stating that appellate courts cannot presume error).
Natasha Siefker Cook and o/b/o Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Custom Farm Servs., (stating that “[b]ecause of the absence of a transcript of the district court proceedings, [the supreme court] cannot consider” several errors that the appellants contend occurred, including “sufficiency of the evidence”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. A. W. and C. M. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Fischer v. Simon , (“It is elementary that a party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary to consider the questions presented.” (quotation omitted)); Custom Farm Servs., (“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.”).
David M. Smith, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“It is elementary that a party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary to consider the questions presented.” (quotation omitted)); see also Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins , (stating that “[b]ecause of the absence of a transcript of the district court proceedings, we cannot consider” several errors that the appellants contend occurred, including “sufficiency of the evidence”
Luisa Petrona Branscum, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See, Custom Farm Servs., Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Error cannot be presumed.” Custom Farm Servs.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Custom Farm Servs., (“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.”).
Credo Salon and Spa, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
App. P. 110.01 (setting forth what constitutes the appellate record); Custom Farm Servs., (“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.”).
Washington County CDA, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.” Custom 5 Farm Servs.
Fr. William Graham, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minnesota recognizes the long -established principle that the appealing party “ has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.” Custom Farm Servs., (declining to consider allegat ion of error in the absence of transcript bearing on issue presented); d 38, 40 (Minn. 1968) (“It is elementary that a party seeking review has a duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins , 306 Minn. 571 , , 609 (1976) (stating that "[a]n appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal" and refusing to consider two arguments "[b]ecause of the absence of a transcript of the district court proceedings").
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
And “[a]n appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.” Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572
Deborah Meckola, as Trustee for the Heirs of Jordan Adams, Decedent v. Thomas J. Rishavy, M.D. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Deborah Meckola, as Trustee for the Heirs of Jordan Adams, Decedent v. Thomas J. Rishavy, M.D. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572, d 608, 609 (1976) (“An appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record for appeal.
Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat f/k/a Mark Edward Wetsch v. Barlin Mohamed Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat f/k/a Mark Edward Wetsch v. Barlin Mohamed Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572, Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., d 142, 146 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bobbie Teeple v. Estate of Dylan Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This principle applies with full force when an appellant 5 seeks a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572, and, more specifically, when the challenged issue is the amount of damages, Bowman v. Pamida, Inc., n.3 (Minn. 1977).
State of Minnesota v. Ali John Moin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ali John Moin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572, Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Ayesha Lynn Khan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ayesha Lynn Khan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 2 Minn. 571, 572, see also Minn. R. Civ.
State of Minnesota v. David Lamar Everett, and David Lamar Everett v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Lamar Everett, and David Lamar Everett v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572, (declining to consider an allegation of error in the absence of a transcript).
Marriage of Hesse v. Hesse 778 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Hesse v. Hesse 778 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572 , (stating that appellate courts cannot presume error).
In Re Peer Review Action 749 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Peer Review Action 749 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572 , (stating that *829 appellate courts do not presume error); see, e.g., Graphic Arts Educ.
State v. Taylor 650 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 2002
State v. Taylor 650 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 2002
Custom Farm Serv., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572
Bunge v. Zachman 578 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Bunge v. Zachman 578 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Custom Farm Servs., Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572
Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821 568 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821 568 N.W.2d 863 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
at 1361 (A court should not "assume that [the] arbitrator has * * * not stayed within the areas marked out for his consideration.”); see also Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572 , (reviewing courts will not presume a lower court erred).
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572 , (appellant has burden of providing an adequate record on appeal).
Hoagland v. State 518 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1994
Hoagland v. State 518 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1994
denied (citing Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571 , ), appeal dis *535 missed, 437 U.S. 901 , 98 S.Ct.
Hunt v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 460 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1990
Hunt v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 460 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1990
See Custom Farm Services v. Collins, 306 Minn. 571, 572