Cited by

When ruling on a motion for a dispositional departure, the district court must focus on the defendant’s characteristics and whether she is “particularly amenable to probation.” Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.3 (2022)

When determining whether a defendant is particularly amenable to probation, a district court may consider factors “including [but not limited to] ‘the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.’” ().

e based on the characteristics of the offender, the focus is on several factors that “can be relevant to determining if a defendant is particularly amenable to probation, including ‘the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.’” ().

Particular amenability to probation can be demonstrated by factors such as “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.”

Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.3.a(7) (2020)

-31 (Minn. 1982) (stating that probation is a dispositional departure when the guidelines recommend an executed sentence).

In assessing particular amenability to probation, a district court considers “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.” see also 12 -09 (Minn. 2014) (stating that defendant must be particularly amenable to probation, not merely amenable).

Appellant’s attorney also presented oral argument, requesting a d 28 (Minn. 1982).

The supreme court has recognized that several factors may be relevant to a district court’s determination of particular amenability to probation, “including the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.”

For all types of offenses, particular amenability to probation can be demonstrated by such factors as “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his 5 cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.”

In determining whether a defendant is particularly amenable to 5 probation so as to justify a downward dispositional departure, a district court may consider, among other things, “the defendant’s age, [her] prior record, [her] remorse, [her] cooperation, [her] attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.”

The relevant factors in assessing amenability include “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.”

Mitigating factors that district courts may consider when determining whether to grant a downward dispositional departure include “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his 23 attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.” d 28, 31 (Minn. 1982).

The relevant factors in assessing amenability include “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.”

The supreme court has recognized that several factors may be relevant to a district court’s determination of whether a defendant is particularly amenable to probation, “including the defendant’s age, h[er] prior record, h[er] remorse, h[er] cooperation, h[er] attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.”

A district court may order a downward dispositional departure upon a determination that the offender is “particular[ly] amenab[l]e to individualized treatment in a probationary setting.”

Several factors, including “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family, are relevant to a determination whether a defendant is particularly suitable to individualized treatment in a probationary setting.”