In re Disciplinary Action Against Hoover
Cited by
Explained in 1
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Johnathon Brock Mattson-McCarty Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Chad Loran Siegel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Samuel Richard Grey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Phillip Charles Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Stephen Carl Allwine, Minn. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Opinion text
ORDER The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Michael J. Hoover has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, respondent failed to cooperate with the Director’s efforts to monitor court-ordered probation, failed to maintain required trust account books and records, neglected a client matter, failed to return unearned fees to a client, failed to provide an accounting to a client, and failed to cooperate with the Director’s investigation of complaints, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.15(a) and (e), 1.16(d), 3.4, 8.1(a)(3), and 8.4(d), and Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The Director and respondent have filed a stipulation in which they state that respondent is disabled and recommend that respondent be transferred to disability inactive status and that further proceedings on the petition for disciplinary action be stayed until such time as respondent petitions for reinstatement under Rules 28(d) and 18, RLPR. The parties further recommend that the notice requirements in Rule 26, RLPR, be waived. Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Michael J. Hoover is transferred to disability inactive status effective immediately. Further proceedings on the pending petition for disciplinary action are stayed until such time as respondent petitions for reinstatement under Rules 28(d) and 18, RLPR. The notice requirements of Rule 26, RLPR, are waived. BY THE COURT: /s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice