Cited by

We have explained that “[a] continuing pattern of client neglect is serious misconduct often warranting indefinite suspension by itself when no evidence of mitigating circumstances is present.” (“[The respondent] engaged in a pattern of neglect and non-communication in multiple client matters, which we consider serious misconduct.”).

Misappropriation occurs when “funds are not kept in trust and are used for a purpose other than one specified by the client.” d 84, 88 (Minn. 2005).

Misappropriation occurs when “funds are not kept in trust and are used for a purpose other than one specified by the client.”

We have explained that “failure to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation, in and of itself, constitutes an act of misconduct that warrants indefinite suspension.”

(“A continuing pattern of client neglect is serious misconduct often warranting indefinite suspension by itself when no evidence of mitigating circumstances is present.”).

See, (“An attorney misappropriates client funds whenever the funds are not kept in trust and are used for a purpose other than one specified by the client.”).

(“We have stressed that failure to cooperate with a disciplinary 7 Butler received a stay of imposition of sentence under Minnesota Statutes section 609.13, subdivision 1.

And “[f]ailure to cooperate with the disciplinary investigation also harm[s] the legal profession by undermining the integrity of the attorney disciplinary system.” see also In re Brooks , (noting our concern with an attorney’s failure “to respond to the Director’s requests for more than one year” and that “failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process hurts .

In re Brooks , –87, 89 (Minn. 2005).

( “We generally impose more severe san ctions when the current 15 misconduct is similar to misconduct for which the attorney has already been disciplined.”).

2 years on an attorney who misappropriated advance expenses from a client, neglected and failed to communicate with a client, failed to appear in court, and failed to cooperate with the Director’s investigation); -89 (Minn. 2005).

and that more ‘extreme’ cases involving client neglect and failure to communicate with clients may merit disbarment” ( )).

d 291, 291-92 (Minn. 2012) (order) (imposing an indefinite suspension for a minimum of 2 years on an attorney who misappropriated a $100 advance from a client, neglected and failed to communicate with a client, failed to appear in court, and failed to cooperate with the Director’s investigation); -87 (Minn. 2005) (imposing 14 an indefinite suspension for a minimum of 2 years on an attorney who neglected two matters and failed to communicate with two clients, misappropriated a $200 filing fee, fa

Misappropriation occurs when client funds “are not kept in trust and are used for a purpose other than one specified by the client.” Harrigan, d at 629 ().

(“We generally impose more severe sanctions when the current misconduct is similar to misconduct for which the attorney has already been disciplined.”).

A “continuing pattern of client neglect is serious misconduct often warranting indefinite suspension by itself when no evidence of mitigating circumstances is present.”

We “generally impose more severe sanctions when the current misconduct is similar to misconduct for which the attorney has already been disciplined.”

Misappropriation of client funds occurs “whenever the funds are not kept in trust and are used for a purpose other than one specified by the client.”

See, (“The failure to maintain *82 proper books and records warrants discipline as well.”); (stating that failure to cooperate “with the disciplinary process constitutes separate misconduct warranting discipline”); (making false statements is “misconduct of the highest order and warrants severe discipline”).

We have articulated that “failure to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation, in and of itself, constitutes an act of misconduct that warrants indefinite suspension.”

or F.P., which the Director characterizes as “tantamount to misappropriation.” “An attorney misappropriates client funds whenever the funds are not kept in trust and are used for a purpose other than one specified by the client.”

(warning that a “continuing pattern of client neglect is serious misconduct often warranting indefinite suspension by itself’).

(“A continuing pattern of client neglect is serious misconduct often warranting indefinite suspension by itself when no evidence of mitigating circumstances is present.”); id.

Failure to cooperate “with the disciplinary process constitutes separate misconduct warranting discipline independent from the conduct underlying the petition.”