Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services, 702 N.W.2d 314.

49 citing documents.

Khalif A. Spry, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Margaret Reynolds, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., (“Employment in an individual’s chosen field is significant and weighs heavily in the individual’s favor.”), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Troy Kenneth Scheffler, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., d 314, 31 9 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Basswood Residence, Inc., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., (acknowledging that “the commissioner’s decision [did] not limit relator’s ability to seek and obtain employment as a counselor in the private sector ,” but concluding “[n]onetheless[] .
Sunshine Childcare Center, LLC v. Ramsey County, Jodi Harpstead, ... 7 N.W.3d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Sunshine Childcare Center, LLC v. Ramsey County, Jodi Harpstead, ... 7 N.W.3d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2 “Procedural due process protections restrain government action which deprives individuals of liberty or property interests within the meaning of the due process clause[s] of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
John Kamande, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re Approving Adverse Action Against the Cigarette/Tobacco Licenses Held by Narjis, LLC, d/b/a East Side Grocery, at … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., - 22 (Minn. App. 2005) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Nicole Monique Collins, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., (balancing Mathews factors) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
A. A. F., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotations omitted); see also Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (indicating that decision to deny a request to set aside disqualification is subject to substantial-evid ence standard of review), review denied (Minn. Nov.
S. K., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
L.J.P., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
3; Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
L. M. P., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Knife River Corporation-North Central, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Zayna Shire, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Procedural due process protections rest rain government action which deprives individuals of ‘liberty’ or ‘property’ interests within the meaning of the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United Stat es Constitution and Article I, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Steven Michael Krause, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An appellate court may reverse an administrative decision if it is not supported by substantial evidence or is arbitrary and capricious.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Matter of: James Steinbach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Excess Surplus St atus of Blue 5 Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
A. L. G., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[R]elator is not disqualified from working in every position in [her] profession; [she] is only disqualified from working in state -regulated facilities.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., , review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Matter of the Maltreatment Appeal of Watta Yanor Kamara. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A decision is arbitrary and capricious “ if there is no rational connection between the facts and the agency’s decision,” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Felicia Marie Thomas, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Id.; see also Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
K.A.J., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
evidence considered in its entirety.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Shonwta Demar Jackson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Employment in an individual’s chosen field is significant and weighs heavily in the individual’s favor.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Jamey Ryan Williams Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g. , Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services , (affirming administrative disqualification based on criminal conviction in part because person “has already been afforded the full panoply of rights in the criminal proceedings”) , review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Appeal by Angela Khanai of the Maltreatment Determinations, Orders of Disqualification, Order to … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Fatoumata Kaba, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Douglas Place Treatment Center, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An agency’s determination is arbitrary when “there is no rational connection between the facts and the agency’s decision.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Audrey Melody Ashford, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Ronald "Arjo" Adams, Relators v. Saint Paul City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ronald "Arjo" Adams, Relators v. Saint Paul City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Eugene Boisson, Relator v. Shepard Parking, LLC, Transport Leasing Contract, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Eugene Boisson, Relator v. Shepard Parking, LLC, Transport Leasing Contract, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 319 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Nov.
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332, 335, 96 S. Ct. 893, 901, 903 (1976)), review denied (Minn. Nov.
John Fasan Atambo, Relator v. Commissioner of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John Fasan Atambo, Relator v. Commissioner of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An appellate court may reverse an administrative decision if it is not supported by substantial evidence or is arbitrary and capricious.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Procedural due process should “be tailored, in light of the decision to be made, to the capacities and circumstances of those who are to be heard, to insure that they are given a meaningful opportunity to present their case.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Ness 819 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Ness 819 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In analyzing these factors, we note that “the concept of procedural due process is flexible.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Thompson v. Commissioner of Health 778 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Thompson v. Commissioner of Health 778 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Two significant due-process cases bear on the decision in this case: review denied (Minn. Nov.
Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES 765 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES 765 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
1 (authorizing commissioner to extend disqualification that would otherwise expire “if the individual continues to pose a risk of harm to persons served by that individual”) (2008); Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (Minn. Nov.
State v. Vang 763 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Vang 763 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, e.g., Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (holding that counselor’s opportunity to submit his written case to the commissioner, along with any supporting documents, satisfied his “right to be heard”).
Obara v. Minnesota Department of Health 758 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Obara v. Minnesota Department of Health 758 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., we observed that “an individual has a property and liberty interest in pursuing private employment” and concluded that a counselor who was disqualified only from working in state-regulated facilities had “a property interest to pursue employment [in his profession] in the public sector.” review denied (Minn. Nov.