Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services, 702 N.W.2d 314.

51 citing documents.

Thomas J. Styczinski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Troy Andre Amundson v. Lora Daly Amundson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., d 314, 319 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Khalif A. Spry v. Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Margaret Reynolds v. Shireen Gandhi, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Servs., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., (“Employment in an individual’s chosen field is significant and weighs heavily in the individual’s favor.”), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Troy Kenneth Scheffler v. Joshua Heintzeman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., d 314, 31 9 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Basswood Residence, Inc. v. Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Servs., (acknowledging that “the commissioner’s decision [did] not limit relator’s ability to seek and obtain employment as a counselor in the private sector ,” but concluding “[n]onetheless[] .
Sunshine Childcare center, LLC, et al v. Ramsey County, Jodi Harpstead, et al., County of Hennepin 7 N.W.3d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Sunshine Childcare center, LLC, et al v. Ramsey County, Jodi Harpstead, et al., County of Hennepin 7 N.W.3d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2 “Procedural due process protections restrain government action which deprives individuals of liberty or property interests within the meaning of the due process clause[s] of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
John Kamande v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re Approving Adverse Action Against the Cigarette/Tobacco Licenses Held by Narjis, LLC, d/b/a East Side Grocery, at … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., - 22 (Minn. App. 2005) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
Nicole Monique Collins v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., (balancing Mathews factors) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
A. A. F v. Minnesota Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotations omitted); see also Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (indicating that decision to deny a request to set aside disqualification is subject to substantial-evid ence standard of review), review denied (Minn. Nov.
S. K v. Minnesota Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
L.J.P. v. Minnesota Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2021
3; Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
L. M. P v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Knife River Corporation-North Central v. Whited Township Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Zayna Shire, et al v. Jodi Harpstead Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Procedural due process protections rest rain government action which deprives individuals of ‘liberty’ or ‘property’ interests within the meaning of the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United Stat es Constitution and Article I, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Steven Michael Krause v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An appellate court may reverse an administrative decision if it is not supported by substantial evidence or is arbitrary and capricious.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Matter of: James Steinbach v. Commissioner of Department of Human Services, McLeod County Social Services Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Excess Surplus St atus of Blue 5 Cross & Blue Shield of Minn., Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
A. L. G v. Minnesota Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[R]elator is not disqualified from working in every position in [her] profession; [she] is only disqualified from working in state -regulated facilities.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., , review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Matter of the Maltreatment Appeal of Watta Yanor Kamara Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A decision is arbitrary and capricious “ if there is no rational connection between the facts and the agency’s decision,” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Felicia Marie Thomas v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Id.; see also Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
K.A.J. v. Emily Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2018
evidence considered in its entirety.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Shonwta Demar Jackson v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Employment in an individual’s chosen field is significant and weighs heavily in the individual’s favor.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Jamey Ryan Williams Respondent v. Pine County Sheriff’s Department Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g. , Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services , (affirming administrative disqualification based on criminal conviction in part because person “has already been afforded the full panoply of rights in the criminal proceedings”) , review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Appeal by Angela Khanai of the Maltreatment Determinations, Orders of Disqualification, Order to … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
Fatoumata Kaba v. Commissioner of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 314, 318 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Douglas Place Treatment Center, LLC v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An agency’s determination is arbitrary when “there is no rational connection between the facts and the agency’s decision.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Audrey Melody Ashford v. Commissioner of Human Services Minnesota Department of Human Services License No. 1063920 CD CS Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Ronald “Arjo” Adams, et al v. Saint Paul City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ronald “Arjo” Adams, et al v. Saint Paul City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Eugene Boisson v. Shepard Parking, LLC, Transport Leasing Contract, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Eugene Boisson v. Shepard Parking, LLC, Transport Leasing Contract, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., d 314, 319 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Nov.
George Marita Obara v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
George Marita Obara v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (citing Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332, 335, 96 S. Ct. 893, 901, 903 (1976)), review denied (Minn. Nov.
John Fasan Atambo v. Commissioner of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John Fasan Atambo v. Commissioner of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An appellate court may reverse an administrative decision if it is not supported by substantial evidence or is arbitrary and capricious.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Procedural due process should “be tailored, in light of the decision to be made, to the capacities and circumstances of those who are to be heard, to insure that they are given a meaningful opportunity to present their case.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Ness 819 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Ness 819 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In analyzing these factors, we note that “the concept of procedural due process is flexible.” Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., review denied (Minn. Nov.
Thompson v. Commissioner of Health 778 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Thompson v. Commissioner of Health 778 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Two significant due-process cases bear on the decision in this case: review denied (Minn. Nov.
Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES 765 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES 765 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
1 (authorizing commissioner to extend disqualification that would otherwise expire “if the individual continues to pose a risk of harm to persons served by that individual”) (2008); Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (Minn. Nov.
State v. Vang 763 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Vang 763 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, e.g., Sweet v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (holding that counselor’s opportunity to submit his written case to the commissioner, along with any supporting documents, satisfied his “right to be heard”).
Obara v. Minnesota Department of Health 758 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2008