Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda, 789 N.W.2d 860.

211 citing documents.

ESA P Portfolio Operating Lessee LLC dba Extended Stay America Suites-Eden Prairie-Valley View Road v. Jessie Lin Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Anda, see Wood v. Diamonds Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., ( “If an argument is raised in a reply brief but not raised in an appellant’s main brief, and it exceeds the scope of the respondent’s brief, it is not properly before [ the court of appeals] .
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Daniel R. Pakonen v. Housing Alternatives Development Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Anda, (quotation omitted).
Bradley Lewis, et al v. Alpine Homes, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Anda, (explaining that, generally, issues not raised or argued in appellant’s principal brief cannot be raised in a reply brief); (stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by t
Joyce Walsh, et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc., John Does 1-50 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mark Schwandt v. Park Christian School, Josh Lee, Raymond Kvalvog, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I., Secura Supreme … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Ingrid Jorgensen, et al v. Aaron Jorgensen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Anda, (repeating that we do not generally address arguments raised for the first time in a party’s reply brief).
Susan Carol Sohn v. Dr. Paul Anthony Arbisi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Anda, (explaining that in general, issues not raised or argued in appellant’s principal brief cannot be raised in a reply brief).
In re the Marriage of: Matthew Beland, et al v. Heidi Beland NKA Heidi Rylander, Polk County Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Original Jurisdiction In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Herbert Azubuike Igbanugo, a Minnesota Minn. 2023
v. Anda, (holding that issues not raised or argued in a principal brief cannot be raised in a reply brief).
Patrick Schaffer, et al v. Curt Haler, et al., Vermillion Acres, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Barbara Henry, Minn. 2023
In Re: Henry Hickman v. Paul Schnell, Commissioner of MN Dept. of Corrections, et al., Sgt. D. Franklin, … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Application of Jose Luis Gutierrez for a change of legal name to Lazarus Twist Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Anda, (stating that generally, issues not raised or argued in appellant’s principal brief cannot be raised in a reply brief).
A minor child by his mother and natural guardian, Chelsea Rose v. Dr. Patricia Kohls, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Sneha Singh v. Ashok Kumar Goyal Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Anda, (civil appeal); d 226, 230 (Minn. App. 2011) (family appeal).
Robert Sharot, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Water Gremlin Company Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Anda, d 860, 865 (Minn. 2010) (involving eminent domain and reduction of property value caused by stigma); -02 (Minn. 1997) (considering appropriate tax rate based on actual contamination cleanup costs and contamination stigma rates).
Joseph Roach, et al v. Thomas Alinder, et al., Gary Heitkamp Construction, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Peter Gerard Lonergan v. Nancy Johnston, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Anda, (stating issues not raised or argued in appellant’s principal brief generally cannot be raised in a reply brief).
Derrick D. Turner v. MG McGrath, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Craig Scherber & Associates, Inc. v. Matt Bullock Contracting Co., Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Anda, (“In the past, we have declined to consider issues raised for the first time in a reply brief, particularly when the theory was not raised at the district court level.”).
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al v. The City of Minneapolis, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Harold Specht Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Anda , Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A.
In the Matter of the Kurt A. Amplatz Funding Trust Dated April 11, 2014, as Amended (A21-0034) and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Anda, see Wood v. Diamonds Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. , (stating that arguments in reply brief that neither were raised in appellant’s principal brief nor respond to respondent’s brief “[are] not properly before [the court of appeals]”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Jomari E Alexander, Sr., Majestic Dreams Holding Co. v. Laurie Ball Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Anda , (discussing the principle that issues not raised or argued in an appellant’s principal brief cannot be raised in a reply brief); Wood v. Diamonds Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., (“If an argument is raised in a reply brief but not raised in an appellant’s main brief
In the Matter of the Determination of the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Nolte Family … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Molly Elizabeth Joyce v. Randy Clement Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Anda, Wood v. Diamonds Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., (“If an argument is raised in a reply brief but not raised in an appellant’s main brie f, and it exceeds the scope of the respondent’s brief, it is not properly before [the court of appeals] .
State of Minnesota v. Jordan Germaine McCray Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Freedom Kerkula v. City of Moorhead, et al., Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Maine Heights LLC v. Mohammed Hayat, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Anda, n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Daniel J. Cafferty v. Mille Lacs Health System, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Minn. 2020
David Timp, et al v. Deborah Gibbs, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Anda, (stating that, generally, issues not raised or argued in appellant’s principal brief cannot be raised in a reply brief).
In re the Billie V. Darkenwald Revocable Trust, dated January 21, 1983, restated February 5, 1999, as amended, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Anda, (“[I]f the plaintiff is entitled to recover on one ground, a court need not consider the other grounds.”).
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, Minn. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Warren Skinaway Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Anda , (quotation omitted).
James A. Compart, et al v. Michael K. Riley, Sr., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Town of White Bear v. Scott Stoddard, et al., County of Ramsey, et al. Below Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Lee DeRosia Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Michael Esaw v. Douglas Eugene Salo, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Rodrigo Esparza, et al v. Nobles County, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Meyer Contracting, Inc. v. Scott Fowler, Graham Construction Services, Inc. and counterclaimant, vs. Brian A. Goudge, et al., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Anda, (quotation omitted).
Lynda Jo Blom v. Douglas County Hospital, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thomas M. Fafinski, P.A., as successor in interest for and f/k/a BenePartum Law Group, P.A. v. Melrose Community, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jason Carlson v. BNSF Railway Company Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Anda, -89 (Minn. 2010).
A18-1406 Scott Kowalewski v. BNSF Railway Company Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696 924 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696 924 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Anda , , 892 (Minn. 2010).
In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing 924 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2019

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by