Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Marriage of Rose v. Rose, 765 N.W.2d 142.

36 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
9 order has the burden of demonstrating both a substantial change in circumstances and the unfairness and unreasonableness of the order because of the change.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A party seeking to modify child support “has the burden of demonstrating both a substantial change in circumstances and the unfairness and unreasonableness of the order because of the change.”
In re the Marriage of: Emily Lynn Rasmussen v. Nicholas Steven Rasmussen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Emily Lynn Rasmussen v. Nicholas Steven Rasmussen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A22-1261 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The party who moves to modify an existing child-support order has the burden of demonstrating both a substantial change in 9 circumstances and the unfairness and unreasonableness of the order because of the change.” .
In re the Marriage of: Marlo Renee Nelson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
2(b)(1); see also Palmquist v. Devens
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Carrie Ann Roth, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Id.; see also Rose v. Rose , (“A court abuses its discretion if it improperly applies the law.”).
In re the Marriage of: Hirut Woldemariam, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Tiffany Elizabeth Jean Banerjee, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of: Dennis J. Arvig, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Mechelle M. Lund, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2(b)(1); d 142, 145 (Minn. App. 2009).
In re the Marriage of: Heidi Marie Owens, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A CSM may modify a child-support order “upon a showing of a substantial change in circumstances that makes the order unreasonable and unfair.” d 142, 145 (Minn. App. 2009) (quotation omitted).
Antoinette Kafui Totimeh, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
’” Rose v. Rose , (quoting Minn. Stat. § 518A.39, subd.
In re the Custody of J. M. H. and A. M. H. Roland John Hillstrom, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district court may modify a child-support order “upon a showing of a substantial change in circumstances that makes the order unreasonable and unfair.” (quotation omitted).
Jeremiah John Palmquist, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A16-1612 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Sheree Rosett Curry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
difference is shown, the presumption of substantial change arising therefrom is irrebuttable.” Rose v. Rose
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Elio Fumagalli, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2(b) (2014); (noting that when a 20% income reduction is proved, the presumption of a substantial change in circumstances is irrebuttable).
Hennepin County, Mamie Jegbadai v. Gbenga Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hennepin County, Mamie Jegbadai v. Gbenga Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Karen Brys n/k/a Karen Warn v. Timothy Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Matter of: Karen Brys n/k/a Karen Warn v. Timothy Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Welsh v. Welsh 775 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Welsh v. Welsh 775 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-47 (Minn.App.2009) (addressing impact of enactment of the income-shares child-support system on modification proceedings).