Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt, 804 N.W.2d 18.

45 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The district court is not required to be exact in its valuation of assets, as long as its valuation “lies within a reasonable range of figures.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re the Marriage of Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“[I]t is only necessary that the value arrived at lies within a reasonable range of figures.” (); rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Similarly, because Maurer simply applies Carrick in a factually similar situation, our analysis of Carrick also addresses Maurer.” (citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
24 (Minn. App. 2011) (stating that a district court “may consider a maintenance recipient ’s prospective ability to become fully or partially self-supporting without making a finding that the recipient has acted in bad faith to remain unemployed or underemployed”), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
24 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Tabitha Ann Sanborn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Husband relies on Passolt v. Passolt , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Mussehl, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We “will affirm the district court ’s division if it ha [s] an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though [we] might have taken a different approach.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Angela Marie Backman, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-25 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Second, “Carrick addressed only the period between the parties’ separation and the dissolution judgment”; district courts “read Carrick too broadly” if they “apply [Carrick ] to the post-judgment period.” rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Antoine Versabeau, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“This court will affirm the district court’s division if it has an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though this court might have taken a different approach.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The district court is not required to be exact in its valuation of assets, as long as its valuation “lies within a reasonable range of figures.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Michael F. Kohorst, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Martin Sean Schmidt, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Julie Ann Schmidt, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Curtis, d at 257; review denied (Minn. Nov.
William Gunder Reppe Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Passolt v. Passolt , , review denied (Minn. Nov.
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In Passolt v. Passolt , review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Passolt v. Passolt , (stating that the maintenance statute requires that the district court must consider all relevant factors), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Gregory Olstad, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
and maintains that the Carrick-bad-faith inquiry does not apply in cases like this one.
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Step re ductions may be appropriate to provide employment incentives fo r a rehabilitating spouse.” Passolt v. Passolt
A17-1036 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Dennis Lee Polla, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In support of this argument, Polla cites Passolt v. Passolt , review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: David Joseph Williams, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
24 n.2 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Passolt v. Passolt , (stating that “[district] courts have broad discretion in establishing maintenance plans, including the use of step reductions” (alternation in original) (d 372, 374 (Minn. App. 1990)), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“This court will affirm the district court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though this court might have taken a different approach.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
assolt, we stated that, when addressing the amount and duration of a maintenance award, “the district court is to consider factors that include the time necessary for the recipient to acquire sufficient education or training to enable him or her to find appropriate employment, and the recipient’s probability of completing education or training and becoming fully or partially self-supporting.” (quotations omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
al education, arguing that the district court erred by dismissing those statements without “stat[ing] with any specificity the basis for these conclusions.” He further argues that the district court’s adoption of Sharon’s proposed findings provides additional evidence that the district court failed to adequately consider her ability to become self- supporting, review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“This court will affirm the district court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though this court might have taken a different approach.” 7 (Minn. App. 2011) (quotation and alterations omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But, “[i]n order to properly consider the financial ability of a spouse, the court must determine the spouse’s net or take-home income.” (similar), review denied (Minn. July 26, 1985); n.3 (Minn. App. 2011) (“[A] district court may not compute the amount of a maintenance award based on an obligor’s earning capacity, absent a finding of the obligor’s bad faith or unjustifiable limitation of income.”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng Fu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng Fu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“This court will affirm the district court’s division of property if it had an acceptable basis in fact and principle even though this court might have taken a different approach.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by