Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Thiel, 846 N.W.2d 605.

42 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-16 (Minn. App. 2014) (concluding in possession-of-controlled-substance case that “[t]he district court did not abuse its 4 Again, our careful review of the record reveals that Skinner’s proffer was that he was offered a PBT, not that Skinner submitted to a PBT.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“On appeal, the defendant has the burden of proving that the district court abused its discretion and that the defendant was thereby prejudiced.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Raenard Romalle Douglas Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Raenard Romalle Douglas Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Third, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(explaining that a state trooper was not obligated to believe a driver’s assertion that there was no marijuana in his vehicle), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Although reasonable suspicion may support a traffic stop, “[a] search of a vehicle without a warrant is justified if there is probable cause to suspect that the vehicle is carrying contraband or illegal merchandise.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
that the vehicle is carrying contraband or illegal merchandise.” - 11 (Minn. App. 2014) (quotation and citations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
then the officer properly conducted a warrantless search of the passenger compartment for marijuana pursuant to the so-called motor vehicle exception to the warrant requirement”); (holding that the odor of marijuana emanating from the appellant’s vehicle provided the officer with probable cause to search the vehicle for marijuana), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A traffic stop has “no rigid limit” to its duration but may continue as long as reasonable suspicion remains, “provided that police act diligently and reasonably.” Stat e v. Thiel, (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See State v. Schultz , (stating that the automobile exception applies when an officer smells marijuana emanating from a car) ; (holding that a vehicle search was justified because the officer “detected a ‘strong’ and ‘overwhelming’ odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(holding that search of vehicle was justified after state trooper “detected a ‘strong’ and ‘overwhelming’ odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Distinguished State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Evidence must be relevant to be admissible, and there is no constitutional right to present irrelevant evidence.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
Deiven Jacques Branch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
It is true that “[t]he discovery of marijuana in a car gives law enforcement probable cause to search for more anywhere in the car where one might reasonably expect to find marijuana.” (citing Schinzing, d at 110), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(recognizing, in the context of a vehicle search, that “strong and overwhelming odor” of marijuana may indicate presence of “ a larger amount of marijuana ” than noncriminal amount acknowledged by suspect), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, , review denied (Minn. Aug.
William Robert Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, -10 (Minn. App. 2014), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Freddie James Prewitt-Bey, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See 7 -89 (Minn. 1991) (applying a more stringent rational basis test to an equal protection challenge that alleges the legislature enacted a particular statute because of an anticipated racial discriminatory effect); (“A cla ssification that does not adversely affect a fundamental right and is not based on a susp ect category is constitutional if it passes rational-basis scrutiny.”).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The temporary detent ion of an individual during a traffic stop is a seizure.” , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Aaron James Helgeson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Aaron James Helgeson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jon Larcom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jon Larcom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We have previously reasoned that “[t]he discovery of marijuana in a car gives law enforcement probable cause to search for more anywhere in the car where one might reasonably expect to find marijuana.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
James David Clark v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James David Clark v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. William Martin Odette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William Martin Odette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The temporary detention of an individual during a traffic stop is a seizure.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Paul Richard Dehn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Richard Dehn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Robbin Alexander McNeil Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Explained State of Minnesota v. Robbin Alexander McNeil Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-15 (Minn. App. 2014), review denied (Minn. May 27, 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Donald Wallace Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald Wallace Butler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Danyelle Raymon Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Danyelle Raymon Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
– 16 (Minn. App. 2014), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue Thorne Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue Thorne Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.